Presidential Debate

And it taxes the rich for being rich at the same time. It's "equality"

 

I believe Obama will win.. b/c
1) people want change
2) people support him
3) he has really good ideas
4) he says he will pull our troops out of iraq
5) b/c we are in a war that no one supports.. theres no reason for us bieng there.. and its due to a republican governmen.. there are democrats in congress but there were more republicans in congress at that time
6) b/c hes a domestic man and we need to worry about our country not about others

 

1) Change for the sake of change is bad.
2) People support McCain to.
3) Obama is a socialist.
4) Obama is not a natural-born citizen. He's a naturalized citizen. Therefor he can't legally be elected.
5) Lots and lots of people support this CONFLICT. It's not a war. You've just never met them.
6) Obama wanted to do a debate instead of figure out a way out of this economy crisis, while McCain asked to hold the debates and look for a way to solve it.

 

NOTE: All sources are noted with a [sup]super scripted[/sup] number, which corresponds with the source list at the bottom of my post.

Yeah, Vice President to someone who would be the oldest president in history, who has also had very bad medical issues, including a possible case of Alzheimer's, as those Double Talk Express videos would, no doubt, lead anyone to assume (either that or he's an expert at changing his opinion every week and forgetting his original opinion).

Being a Governor is harder than being a President? Since when has running a state with a few hundred thousand people ever been harder than actually trying to run an entire country with hundreds of millions of people? Are you incapable of mathematics?

Here's the math:
a (Alaska) = 670,053
c (country) = 299,398,484

c/a = about 447

The United States would have 447 times the amount of people in Alaska[sup]1[/sup], as well as 49 more states to have to work for, which means different economic stats (especially compared to a state with less people than some cities![sup]2[/sup]), different environments to take care of, and different people to deal with.

Let's compare Alaska's entire population to Dallas, Texas. Alaska, as an entire state, has 670,053 people, while Dallas, as a single city, has 1,232,940. Texas, as a whole, has 23,507,783 people.[sup]3[/sup]

Even as a Vice-President, she's not qualified. She needs more time, especially since she's in a state with less people than a lot of cities.

Sources: 1, 2, 3


Neither candidate has what this country needs.

 

1) Thats why it's NOT for the sake of change. They want change for the better.
2) Partially because he makes personal attacks on Obama, while Obama just toughs it up.
3) And that is why he WILL be elected. There's so many more poor people than rich people, and Obama's plans are only good for them.
4) Oh Well.
5) Um, it's a fucking war. You don't send thousands of troops to fight in a CONFLICT.
6) I'm not sure, but maybe he thought of a plan already? :huh:

 

Obama has policy. His policy is going to be that change, and a lot of that is what I would consider a step in the right direction.

Obama is not a socialist, the way you use the word shows how narrow your understanding of politics is.

I don't know where Obama was born, but I think that law is idiotic.

The Iraqi people want the US out. Why don't we just get out and start paying them reparations?

 

Proof Obama is a socialist.

However idiotic the law might be, he's still not qualified for the position.

No duh they want us out. We go barging into their homes, looking for terrorists.

It's the easiest way to do it though, and we have permission from the Iraqi government to do it anywase. The Iraqi people want us out, but the Government doesn't.

 

Thank you they needed to see that. Shows how are person like obama responds without being prepared before or having a piece of paper to read off of.

 

If Obama is going to turn America socialist, then the rest of the developed world is already socialist! Real socialism is the type we saw in east Germany prior to the collapse of the Berlin wall - it's completely different to what Obama has planned. Where in Obama's policy does it say he is going to nationalize industry with the long-term aim of handing it over to the workers?

And this is what comes from wailing about the rights of the Iraqi people and establishing democracy?

 

Who says we want to be like the rest of the developed world? The rest of the developed world isnt all that great. The global economy is doing bad so looks like socialist nor what were doing right now is right.

 

McCain for me

 

I believe McCain was focusing on Barack's character. Whereas, Barack was focused on McCain's economic policy. I would not vote for either of them.

 

Screw McCain, he will die in office, obama will be assassinated. but before the assassination, he will give SOME CHANGE not WAR. ty, that is all.

 

Half of us have halo or runescape sigs in our profiles. I highly doubt we should even care what the hell these politicians are talking about...

 

You, need to get your head out of your ass and watch the news.

 

Nah im good
ill stick to being close minded ;p

 

McCain has a worn out body, Obama is a Socialist. We're fucked either way.

I hate them both and the nation is starting too as well. Every presidential race, people always regret the last 2 votes and want people like Ron Paul back or some shit.

 

I'd honestly rather have somebody who has a slight chance to die in office, than a socialist..


If McCain dies in officer. Hello first female president.

 

Yeah, that's what we need. A slut that we're not ready for.

 

I personally think Obama may be assassinated by the KKK or the islam countrys. He probably will end up like Malcom X.

McCain just fits in better than Obama in my opinion. Yet, McCain will probably bring back the draft.