70% vouches
20% join date
10% posts.
just like the other kid, this is right.
Anyone can scam whether it be members or moderators.
70% vouches
20% join date
10% posts.
just like the other kid, this is right.
It's all common sense. Put yourselves in their shoes. If they have 1000 posts in a year period, do you think that's worth more than your 5$ trade? Shit like that. Post count shouldn't be relied on entirely... but it's a good factor.
Also, vouches shouldn't be counted on entirely either. I mean, you see leechers with 20 vouches all the time. People trade vouches, fake them, and get ones for weak things.
You need to combine all of them, including stuff like donations and popularity on the site. If in doubt, demand a MM, or at least be sure to get sufficient proof to ban them if anything goes awry.
EDIT:
^ LOL, I kinda went into lecture mode in the end
if I see someone with like 1-1.5k+ post count, im not gonna care if he has 0 vouches, ill trust him.
I'd say this:
I'd rather trust an active member with 125 posts and 20 vouches then a Guru with 10.
I have very few posts, and I don't even collect my vouches, but I've never scammed and never plan to.
disagree. scammers get like 20 post count.. then say there not new...
i would definetly trust someone with 500+ posts. it shows they have used this for a long time and dont wanna get banned
So your saying someone with 500 posts who joined in November 2009 is more trustworthy with someone of 50 quality posts who join in April 2005?
It's all common sense. Put yourselves in their shoes. If they have 1000 posts in a year period, do you think that's worth more than your 5$ trade? Shit like that. Post count shouldn't be relied on entirely... but it's a good factor.
Also, vouches shouldn't be counted on entirely either. I mean, you see leechers with 20 vouches all the time. People trade vouches, fake them, and get ones for weak things.
You need to combine all of them, including stuff like donations and popularity on the site. If in doubt, demand a MM, or at least be sure to get sufficient proof to ban them if anything goes awry.
EDIT:
^ LOL, I kinda went into lecture mode in the end

