Recently there has been multiple service providers reported against for botting. With previous reports of being reported for botting. However most of the time it is impossible to prove who actually botted. So most service providers place in their TOS they will not be responsible for botting bans, which i agree you shouldn't be blacklisted for botting bans if you provide a legitimate service and do not bot, however i believe the following should apply; A rule should be brought in where if with good reason you have been reported for botting you should be issued a TWC, linking to the botting report. Even if you have stated you will not take responsibility for botting on your TOS This would then put the service providers who have known botting practices on the radar to help people choose the right service provider, sometimes cheap service providers just provide cheap botted services. However if the service provider can provide SCREENSHOTS, not just Crtl + Prnt Sc, the whole screen of the client or recorded evidence of training the account, with clear evidence that no bots are in operation then obviously the TWC would not apply, because it would be clear that the Service Provider did not bot.