• Log in or sign up for an account here: https://www.sythe.org/login

New rule, infractable

TJ

Hero
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Sythe Gold
42
Messages
5,922
This is to stop all the people from suggesting the same thing over and over.

Whatever is on the do not suggest list, if you post it, you get infracted for it.

This way to stop all the same suggestions, over and over.

Comments/discussion are welcomed
 
/Disagree.
It's ridiculous to ask to update every suggestion that gets accepted/denied, so that other users don't re-suggest it. It's simple, if they suggest it and it has already been denied, the thread will be closed.
 
I disagree, because what if the variables in the matter change. So someone suggests something at one point, and it gets denied. Then in the future something happens that effects that decision, and it is brought up again and accepted?
 
/Disagree.
It's ridiculous to ask to update every suggestion that gets accepted/denied, so that other users don't re-suggest it. It's simple, if they suggest it and it has already been denied, the thread will be closed.

You don't have to update it. Simply, if its against the rules to post it then why not infract for it? You should read threads before posting.

I disagree, because what if the variables in the matter change. So someone suggests something at one point, and it gets denied. Then in the future something happens that effects that decision, and it is brought up again and accepted?

Obviously if its against the rules to suggest it, and on the thread, then its not going to be implemented

im with enlightenMe, i disagrees

Don't spam my thread, twat. Post reasons
 
ElivOk, you only disagreed because you have your own thread that is against the Do Not Suggest list.

I support. If people can't read the stickies, they should be punished for it. It gets really old when people keep suggesting Shoutboxes, ranks etc etc.
 
I support. If people can't read the stickies, they should be punished for it. It gets really old when people keep suggesting Shoutboxes, ranks etc etc.

Post limitation is the one that bugs me the most, and what led me to post this.
 
i kind of agree, but all the time we dont think alike all the time... so if you got something that is similar to the do not suggest list opinion then you can make a post that will look something like "this suggestions looks like (a suggestion) but here is the difference" and then well... thats what i think ;) otherwise good thinking :D
 
I disagree, for the same reasons as EnlightenMe.

Quit spamming my thread.

yeh good idea

You to.

i kind of agree, but all the time we dont think alike all the time... so if you got something that is similar to the do not suggest list opinion then you can make a post that will look something like "this suggestions looks like (a suggestion) but here is the difference" and then well... thats what i think ;) otherwise good thinking :D

If its on the do not suggest list, then no form of its going to be allowed obviously.
 
/Disagree.
It's ridiculous to ask to update every suggestion that gets accepted/denied, so that other users don't re-suggest it. It's simple, if they suggest it and it has already been denied, the thread will be closed.

Totally agree with Analog, it would be so time consuming and a pain to update the Denied list everytime a suggestion gets denied.

iDisagree
 
I agree!

Maybe make more section mods for the suggestion forum to keep it free of spam.:cool:
 
Totally agree with Analog, it would be so time consuming and a pain to update the Denied list everytime a suggestion gets denied.

iDisagree

I am not saying update the list every time. I am simply stating that if its one of the do nots, do not suggest it. And most of the denied are already on the do not suggest list :S

I agree!

Maybe make more section mods for the suggestion forum to keep it free of spam.:cool:

Get off of here with your faggotry. You are suggesting more mods, which is against the do not suggest list.
 
I disagree, because what if the variables in the matter change. So someone suggests something at one point, and it gets denied. Then in the future something happens that effects that decision, and it is brought up again and accepted?

Makes no sense. Here is an example (go with it, I know it's not actually going to happen)

Person A makes thread about requirements for the black market.

Person A gets infracted because it is in the thread.

The black market gets a requirement rule, for whatever reason.

Fact is, Person A made the thread when it was still against the rules. Even if that rule changed in the future, he still disobeyed while it was still in effect.
 
The fact that breaking the stickies guidelines isn't already infractable is ridiculous. Agreed.

inorite?

I am talking to a couple mods about this..we shall see how it goes.
 
Runescape Gamblingrunescape gambling
Back
Top