naiss forum /Ó_ò\

no is no.

 

no is no.

 

I don't normally talk about how by balancing the theoretical untruth and nonsense of Yutsuk's double standards with the reality of this phenomenon we can see that all of Yutsuk's conjectures contain smarmy elements. However, in this case I'm going to make an exception. I figure it's okay because Yutsuk's surrogates can conceive of nothing but insidious, unforgiving defenses of his morally crippled, wishy-washy reinterpretations of historic events. The key point of the following exposition is that if my memory serves me correctly, Yutsuk prefers defamation to dialogue. There are several logical contradictions in his position on this matter. For example, I am more than merely surprised by Yutsuk's willingness to make excessive use of foul language. I'm shocked, shocked. And, as if that weren't enough, Yutsuk's insinuations are geared toward the continuation of social stratification under the rubric of "tradition". Funny, that was the same term that his spin doctors once used to retard the free and natural economic development of various countries' indigenous population.

Yutsuk and I disagree about our civic duties. I profess that we must do our utmost to cross-examine his raucous, raving schemes. Yutsuk, on the other hand, believes that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones. For the moment, he makes no secret of the fact that what I wrote just a moment ago is not the paranoid rambling of a birdbrained wacko. It's a fact.

Yutsuk periodically puts up a façade of reform. However, underneath the pretty surface, it's always business as usual. He uses language that would make a sailor blush. In fact, I have said that to Yutsuk on many occasions, and I will keep on saying it until he stops trying to deploy enormous resources in a war of attrition against helpless citizens. There are two kinds of people in this world. There are those who subvert our country's legal system, and there are those who restore the world back to its original balance. Yutsuk fits neatly into the former category, of course. His occasional demonstrations of benevolence are not genuine. Nor are Yutsuk's promises. In fact, I have a dream, a mission, a set path that I would like to travel down. Specifically, my goal is to debunk the nonsense spouted by Yutsuk's cohorts. Of course, his publications promote a redistribution of wealth. This is always an appealing proposition for Yutsuk's intimates because much of the redistributed wealth will undoubtedly end up in the hands of the redistributors as a condign reward for their loyalty to Yutsuk.

We are observing the change in our society's philosophy and values from freedom and justice to corruption, decay, cynicism, and injustice. All of these "values" are artistically incorporated in one person: Yutsuk. His methods are reliably unreliable. That's probably obvious to a blind man on a galloping horse. Nevertheless, I suspect that few people reading this letter are aware that Yutsuk actually believes that censorship could benefit us. True, Yutsuk has a right to his opinion. In his mind, he also apparently has a right to be a hectoring power broker as evidenced by his endless attempts to meddle in everyone else's affairs.

Just because Yutsuk and his acolytes don't like being labelled as "contumacious mendicants" or "incompetent, conniving exhibitionists" doesn't mean the shoe doesn't fit. I am sorry to have to put this so bluntly, but even his serfs are afraid that he will show us a gross miscarriage of common judgment eventually. I have seen their fear manifested over and over again, and it is further evidence that Yutsuk has been causing riots in the streets. If there were any semblance of decency left in his camp that ought to be an affront to it. Sadly, that's a big "if"; we all know that I want to live my life as I see fit. I can't do that while Yutsuk still has the ability to convince innocent children to follow a path that leads only to a life of crime, disappointment, and destruction.

While Yutsuk's suggestions may seem disreputable, they're in agreement with Yutsuk's obnoxious practices. Contrary to what Yutsuk would have you believe, over time, his remarks have progressed from being merely insipid to being superinsipid, hyperinsipid, and recently ultrainsipid. In fact, I'd say that now they're even megainsipid. His slogans all stem from one, simple, faulty premise—that he is a tireless protector of civil rights and civil liberties for all people. I have never been in favor of being gratuitously churlish. I have also never been in favor of sticking my head in the sand or of refusing to answer the blathering Machiavellians who adopt approaches that have not been tested to try to solve problems that have not been well-defined.

Yutsuk is typical of phlegmatic thought police in his wild invocations to the irrational, the magic, and the fantastic to dramatize his conclusions. What if we collectively just told his goons, "Sure, go ahead and stonewall on issues in which taxpayers see a vital public interest. Have fun!"? That would be worse than snappish; it would exploit the masses.

Although Yutsuk has managed to avoid indictment, or even a consensus that he did anything illegal, if the people generally are relying on false information sown by dysfunctional gutter-dwellers, then correcting that situation becomes a priority for the defense of our nation. I don't know what makes him think that slaphappy know-nothings and wrongheaded bourgeoisie should rule this country. Maybe he's been sipping cuckoo juice. The fact of the matter is that purists may object to my failure to present specific examples of Yutsuk's brutish, vile programs of Gleichschaltung. Fortunately, I do have an explanation for this omission. The explanation demands an understanding of how Yutsuk's hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least discerning among us can see right through it.

In retrospect, Yutsuk has always been more counter-productive than most stroppy schmoes. I, hardheaded cynic that I am, find his hatchet jobs rather venal, don't you? Nevertheless, he is like a stray pigeon. Pigeons are too self-absorbed to care about anyone else. They poo on people they don't like; they poo on people they don't even know. The only real difference between Yutsuk and a pigeon is that Yutsuk intends to break us up into a set of quarreling, wrangling, squabbling factions. That's why prudence is no vice. Cowardice—especially Yutsuk's homophobic form of it—is.

Yutsuk's claims leave me with several unanswered questions: How will his fans react when they discover that he wants to make it impossible to disturb his boisterous, drossy gravy train? And what accounts for his prodigious criminality and dissipation? These are difficult questions to answer because he loves getting up in front of people and telling them that he is a man of peace. He then boasts about how he'll squander irreplaceable national treasures some day. It's all part of the media spectacle that is Yutsuk. Of course, he soaks it up and wallows in it like a pig in mud. Speaking of pigs and mud, the first lies that Yutsuk told us were relatively benign. Still, they have been progressing. And they will continue to progress until there is no more truth; his lies will grow until they blot out the sun. Yutsuk's disagreeable solutions have caused a deepening feeling of ennui and lethargy to grip society. And that's all I have to say.

 

5 posts in a row? looks like flooding to me. reported.

 

wtf is happening?? i was clicking multiple times on the submit reply button and it was not loading and now i have multiple posts o.o

 

yutsuck..

what do you want

 

die please, ill vouch

 

Lol newfag thinks hes funny

 

who are you?

 

you sir are a fagg

 

Spam Forum is like the cool kids table at lunch.. maybe you should go sit with the teachers or something?

 

what forum section is "the teachers"?

 

i believe it was some kind of very old and powerful selfownage. amirite??

 

Report Scammer/ Middle man kbye

 

Good night, sweet prince.

 

yo dont be talkin on yutsuk

 

^ THIS