my dispute again a stupid infraction

[jCash]

Dear jcash4991,

You have received an infraction for Flaming for the content of this post: http://www.sythe.org/showthread.php?p=4965036

-------
Generally, don't incite more flaming / arguments. He got what he deserved, too.

really, am i really seeing this?
let's take a quick look at the lastest spam forum rules

ALL of the Sythe.org rules (which can be found here: http://sythe.org/showthread.php?t=148431) are still in effect EXCEPT for
- Spamming
- Gravedigging
- Mild Flaming
Break any of the rules and you will still be infracted.

Also: VOUCH THREADS ARE NOT ALLOWED

aha!
mildflaming is aloud i see!

that is all i belive i have done!
i have seen so much worse get away with no infractions!
1) i didn't cuss
2)am i ment to let him insult mods?
3 jeez

now, i'm also thinking that Tgump mayhave given me this infraction and another one that i'm not disputing because of the tread i made about his inactivity, if true then wowsad.
(http://www.sythe.org/showthread.php?t=627153)

if needs be i will edit in some worse flaming that gotaway with it.
please read and reply

jCash4991.

​

 

[Sin666]

I'll reverse the infraction.

However, I doubt Tgump had any personal reasons for giving it. It wasn't that what you said was bad, but that your intent was. You were picking a fight with the kid and trying to piss him off; "mild flaming" generally refers to good-natured joking around.