More Damn Infractions

[Sorry Im F2P]

ok sum infractions i deserve.


but when trading i dont screeny every damn sentance thats said on msn do i?


people fucking scam and get away with it because people "dont post evidence"

i try help this damn community out and i get a damn infraction?


ive done over 65 trades with people and for people u want a screeni of every damn one?

"this person scams"

well do u have fuckin dental records, finger prints and a picture of them from there 1966 year book?

"well no sorry i dont"

DENIED NICE INFRACTION U GOT YOUR SELF, CARRY ON SCAMMING


from now on screw it leave em to get scammed

 

[x⁹]

Cool story, bro. Read the rules. You may have your HUGE 65 TRADES but one false accusation can tarnish anyone's reputation. That's why we require proof and that's why you get an infraction if you accuse someone of scamming without proof.

Denied.

 

[Sin666]

1. Spam
http://www.sythe.org/showthread.php?p=4981657#post4981657

That one was deserved; your opinion of his MSN address had nothing to do with the sale.

2. Accusing of Scamming without Proof http://www.sythe.org/showthread.php?p=4979267#post4979267 (hidden)

This forum is to dispute infractions that you believe were given by mistake. It is not a place to rant about the rules and why they exist in the first place.

However, I'll answer anyway:

First of all, you may think that you're helping, but scam accusations rarely stop people from trading when there is no evidence. All the trader has to say is that you were bitter over a refused offer, or had some motive or another to accuse him.

Second, you are viewing the situation from the wrong perspective. It may seem fine to accuse someone...until you end up on the wrong side of it. What if a trader confused you with someone else (or with one of your impostors) and started posting in your threads, "'sorry im f2p' is a scammer, don't trade with him," etc?

Even if it didn't stop people from trading, it might still hurt your reputation, your chances of becoming an official, and so on. It is not fair to let people destroy another's reputation unless they have evidence to support their claim.

That said, the infraction is deserved.

 

[x⁹]

Is there an echo in here?

 

[Sin666]

My attention span is worse that a goldfish's. I got a bit sidetracked while writing that

You hadn't posted yet.

 

[x⁹]

LOL ok.