Morals

[Arya]

If the train is headed towards the 10 people, then to redirect it is to murder one person. Where do you draw your objective line where the end ceases to justify the means?

Common-sense. Perhaps it is to murder one person, however when put in the event of deciding lives, especially of those that I don't know, I personally would think that of the little logic and reason there has been, it would be with murdering one person. You can't drag the fact that, "Oh, well, you're murdering that one person, with feelings, blah", because then the question would be unanswerable.

Perhaps your answer can relate? I haven't seen you subjugate your opinion from the masses, like usual. Where do you stand?

What would you do, in the events?

 

[porman]

If the train is headed towards the 10 people, then to redirect it is to murder one person. Where do you draw your objective line where the end ceases to justify the means?

If the train was heading towards 3 million people, would you still do nothing? would you still call it murder to sacrifice one?

Its not murder, its choosing the lesser of 2 evils. What you dont realise is that because you have the power to choose who lives and who dies, by not doing anything you are CHOOSING to kill 10 people, and therefore are responsible for there death. You are just as guilty for murder.

I would imagine you would be the type of person who would do nothing even if there was no one on the other tracks, simply because you think "i have no obligation to save this man"