Modern world vs. Natural selection

Discussion in 'Archives' started by TJ, Feb 15, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Modern world vs. Natural selection
  1. Unread #1 - Feb 15, 2009 at 9:18 AM
  2. TJ
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Posts:
    5,922
    Referrals:
    4
    Sythe Gold:
    42

    TJ Hero

    Modern world vs. Natural selection

    Well, i was sitting here reading the paper on how people get medication to cure diseases and such. Which lead me to the question of this : Is medication getting rid of natural selection? You don't have retards running into the wilderness (as often) and getting ate off. You have natural selection in the lower animal class (yes, humans are animals) but do we still have it in humans?

    So the main questions here are :

    ~Do we have natural selection in humans still? Give examples
    ~If so, is it a good thing?
    ~Is the advancement of medication replacing it?
     
  3. Unread #2 - Feb 15, 2009 at 9:30 AM
  4. SuF
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Posts:
    14,211
    Referrals:
    28
    Sythe Gold:
    1,234
    Discord Unique ID:
    203283096668340224
    <3 n4n0 Two Factor Authentication User Community Participant Spam Forum Participant Sythe's 10th Anniversary

    SuF Legend
    Pirate Retired Global Moderator

    Modern world vs. Natural selection

    Well, I think that natural selection has really stopped for humans since we can keep people alive that should have died... But, people still get Darwin awards for dying in really stupid ways... Like one dude won it since he was emailing on his laptop while driving crashed and died... Thats natural selection for ya. :D

    But I do believe it has stopped for the main part...
     
  5. Unread #3 - Feb 15, 2009 at 9:50 AM
  6. TJ
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Posts:
    5,922
    Referrals:
    4
    Sythe Gold:
    42

    TJ Hero

    Modern world vs. Natural selection

    New question added to the list : Is that a good thing?
     
  7. Unread #4 - Feb 15, 2009 at 10:07 AM
  8. SuF
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Posts:
    14,211
    Referrals:
    28
    Sythe Gold:
    1,234
    Discord Unique ID:
    203283096668340224
    <3 n4n0 Two Factor Authentication User Community Participant Spam Forum Participant Sythe's 10th Anniversary

    SuF Legend
    Pirate Retired Global Moderator

    Modern world vs. Natural selection

    Well, it most likely helps the spreading of genetic problems since we can still live with them now.
     
  9. Unread #5 - Feb 15, 2009 at 10:59 AM
  10. Damien0124
    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Posts:
    1,851
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Damien0124 Guru
    Banned

    Modern world vs. Natural selection

    Well, I read something about this in a schoolbook. It was an article, but I don't have the book here with me. I think Darwin wrote about this, but I'm not really sure, since I don't have the book with he source with me.

    It says that humans will no longer evolve, since natural selection is no longer valid, the weak are just as likely to reproduce as the strong.
     
  11. Unread #6 - Feb 15, 2009 at 11:40 AM
  12. rs nechryeal
    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2007
    Posts:
    2,030
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    rs nechryeal Grand Master

    Modern world vs. Natural selection

    We absolutely do but it's not natural selection by disease and sickness. I believe that it's now natural selection by intelligence. Those who are unintelligent may die accidental deaths.
     
  13. Unread #7 - Feb 15, 2009 at 11:59 AM
  14. Damien0124
    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Posts:
    1,851
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Damien0124 Guru
    Banned

    Modern world vs. Natural selection

    I agree with your first argument. Our intelligence may still be evolving, but our bodies won't.
    I don't agree with your second argument, since even intelligent people die in accidents.
     
  15. Unread #8 - Feb 15, 2009 at 12:24 PM
  16. Leroy Johnson
    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2009
    Posts:
    200
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Leroy Johnson Active Member

    Modern world vs. Natural selection

    Natural selection has pretty much stopped in humans but it's not really necesary anyways since we have so much technology.
     
  17. Unread #9 - Feb 15, 2009 at 12:26 PM
  18. rs nechryeal
    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2007
    Posts:
    2,030
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    rs nechryeal Grand Master

    Modern world vs. Natural selection

    Only the intelligent get to pass their genes on so I consider that natural selection
     
  19. Unread #10 - Feb 15, 2009 at 12:47 PM
  20. Damien0124
    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Posts:
    1,851
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Damien0124 Guru
    Banned

    Modern world vs. Natural selection

    Can you explain it why dumb parents get smart kids sometimes? Or vice versa?
     
  21. Unread #11 - Feb 15, 2009 at 12:57 PM
  22. rs nechryeal
    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2007
    Posts:
    2,030
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    rs nechryeal Grand Master

    Modern world vs. Natural selection

    Study and education. Genes are a factor but not the only one
     
  23. Unread #12 - Feb 15, 2009 at 1:38 PM
  24. TJ
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Posts:
    5,922
    Referrals:
    4
    Sythe Gold:
    42

    TJ Hero

    Modern world vs. Natural selection

    Dominant and recessive genes.
     
  25. Unread #13 - Feb 15, 2009 at 2:06 PM
  26. IcyDude
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2008
    Posts:
    339
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    IcyDude Forum Addict
    Banned

    Modern world vs. Natural selection

    well, the "predator" aspect is clearly gone for humans, and disease is less influental as it used to be.....but breeding is still a powerful agent of natural selection

    people still mate with each other based on traits like physical appearence ETC, so it is sitll a source of natural selection.


    but yeah, humans have pretty much gotten themselves out of the natural selection system
     
  27. Unread #14 - Feb 15, 2009 at 2:30 PM
  28. 333
    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Posts:
    4,457
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    10

    333 Grand Master
    Banned

    Modern world vs. Natural selection

    for humans natural selection is basically humans killing other humans unless there is a new virus and deadly as the bubonic plague
     
  29. Unread #15 - Feb 15, 2009 at 11:08 PM
  30. god69er
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2008
    Posts:
    182
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    god69er Active Member

    Modern world vs. Natural selection

    too bad there isn't much natural selection in humans. its horrible seeing children born to burnout drug addicts and drunks who should have died off long ago. Those children will usually grown up to be like their parents which shows the weak are still reproducing :/
     
  31. Unread #16 - Feb 15, 2009 at 11:14 PM
  32. Shawn_
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Posts:
    1,833
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Shawn_ Something for All Don - Shawn passed away. RIP.
    Banned

    Modern world vs. Natural selection


    No medication isn't getting rid fo natural selection, humans evolved to trump their opponents not by strength but by brain power, medication IS evolution.

    ~Do we have natural selection in humans still? Give examples

    Yes.

    Cancer-related genes, People doing stupid things, etc.

    Almost all deaths fall in a way under natural selection, if you were hit by a bus for example, an evolutionist may say you lacked the sensory to detect the bus.

    ~If so, is it a good thing?

    In 1904 the first plane flew.

    In 1969 man landed on the moon.

    I'd say that's quite in improvement over apes.

    ~Is the advancement of medication replacing it?

    See above, medication is simply a form of how the species has evolved.

    When we came out of the trees humans realized that the most effective way to survive in this world was to stick together, in doing so one who created medication for a population is supported by that population (in modern society that would be by money).
     
  33. Unread #17 - Feb 16, 2009 at 10:00 AM
  34. TJ
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Posts:
    5,922
    Referrals:
    4
    Sythe Gold:
    42

    TJ Hero

    Modern world vs. Natural selection

    I can always rely on you shawn for a good and educated answer ^.^
     
  35. Unread #18 - Feb 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM
  36. r 0w12
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Posts:
    1,270
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    r 0w12 Guru
    Banned

    Modern world vs. Natural selection

    We really don't have natural selection anymore and in some ways its a bad thing because if idiotic/retarded people/physically handicapped (from birth) reproduce it hurts the human race.
     
  37. Unread #19 - Feb 16, 2009 at 1:16 PM
  38. Leroy Johnson
    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2009
    Posts:
    200
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Leroy Johnson Active Member

    Modern world vs. Natural selection

    Most of the time they don't reproduce as much though.
     
  39. Unread #20 - Feb 16, 2009 at 4:12 PM
  40. Koot
    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    612
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Koot Forum Addict

    Modern world vs. Natural selection

    It would stop some but not all.

    Genetic related diseases that can be helped with medication is still being passed around. We won't have a natural way to stop it, but the medication will.
     
< Selling 100% No pen BH Method | [PAYPAL][PINS]Selling RS name's[best name shop][PAYPAL][PINS] >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.


 
 
Adblock breaks this site