I don't know about any of you; but I feel that vouches are given out too often when not deserved. I feel as if the amount of vouches given out is reduced, because it's basically a pointless feedback that members gain so they can scam.
What i'm proposing is that vouches should not be given out when:
A middleman is used. The two members that used the middleman should vouch for the middleman, since he's the one that's being trusted. The two members using him aren't doing anything that proves they're legitimacy. This goes for all sorts of "middlemen", such as OMM's, Free MM's, or even Player Auctions, really.
This also applies to when someone goes first. I'll place an example on this part.
Player A is the extremely trusted seller. ($300 donor, global moderator, highly trusted rank)
Player B is the noob buyer.
Player B buys 300M off of Player A via WU. Player B vouches for Player A, and Player A vouches for Player B. Player B really didn't deserve a vouch because he's only proving that he bought something going first. It doesn't prove in any way that he won't scam if he doesn't go first.
Thoughts?
/edit
A magnificent idea that FireZ brought up was:
What i'm proposing is that vouches should not be given out when:
A middleman is used. The two members that used the middleman should vouch for the middleman, since he's the one that's being trusted. The two members using him aren't doing anything that proves they're legitimacy. This goes for all sorts of "middlemen", such as OMM's, Free MM's, or even Player Auctions, really.
This also applies to when someone goes first. I'll place an example on this part.
Player A is the extremely trusted seller. ($300 donor, global moderator, highly trusted rank)
Player B is the noob buyer.
Player B buys 300M off of Player A via WU. Player B vouches for Player A, and Player A vouches for Player B. Player B really didn't deserve a vouch because he's only proving that he bought something going first. It doesn't prove in any way that he won't scam if he doesn't go first.
Thoughts?
/edit
A magnificent idea that FireZ brought up was:
I'd rather see vouches like this....
Vouch for _____, I went ....... and sold ......via .......
To add onto this.....
Example: Vouch for Aroxez, (I went 2nd/he went first)and sold him 873m via WU @ .60 a M. Trade went smooth and easy.
Rather then this.....
Sold Aroxez 873m, vouch







