Make Placing Miniranks Easier & More Convenient

[Mootrucks]

As of right now placing miniranks is nothing short of aids, when placing miniranks it's not easy to determine which minirank will be where especially if you have over 10 miniranks (1 row of miniranks) and even then sometimes you don't know what order they will end up being in the terms of left to right or right to left. Not to mention the fact that once you hit 25 miniranks it creates another row making it even more confusing..

I'm suggesting that we should be able to drag miniranks exactly where we want them to be placed & it should always be right to left instead of having it randomly be left to right sometimes. It should be almost like a very organized container having two rows of 10 with two columns(three rows of 10/three columns if you're a $300+ donor of course,) & to prevent people skipping the first row and going onto the next row make it so they have to fill out the first row before being able to access the second one.

This is a simple quality of life update that would please many people, to be quite honest not sure why it hasn't been done already.

5% Credit to @Scotty & @Shin & @Sonia (for being my mommy)

 

[Felix]

As of right now placing miniranks is nothing short of aids, when placing miniranks it's not easy to determine which minirank will be where especially if you have over 10 miniranks (1 row of miniranks) and even then sometimes you don't know what order they will end up being in the terms of left to right or right to left. Not to mention the fact that once you hit 25 miniranks it creates another row making it even more confusing..

I'm suggesting that we should be able to drag miniranks exactly where we want them to be placed & it should always be right to left instead of having it randomly be left to right sometimes. It should be almost like a very organized container having two rows of 10 with two columns(three rows of 10/three columns if you're a $300+ donor of course,) & to prevent people skipping the first row and going onto the next row make it so they have to fill out the first row before being able to access the second one.

This is a simple quality of life update that would please many people, to be quite honest not sure why it hasn't been done already.

5% Credit to @Scotty & @Shin & @Sonia (for being my mommy)

Support 10000%, shit gets annoying at times, please fix this asap

 

Support Sonia is never wrong

 

Disappointed that I wasn't shouted out but k. Yeah when I had a phat load of minis this was annoying had to re arrange shit randomly until it went into an order I liked, support.

 

Support. Not sure why the minirank manager wasn't implemented like that in the first place.

 

[DaltyF]

Pretty sure 97% of users have suggested this before, but sure.

 

Support cos the community needs it.

I'd suggest sticking it in the bugtracker under user center, so Matthew can get round to it.

Although I've got the hang of getting mine in order I'm just that little bit extra.

 

Support cos the community needs it.

I'd suggest sticking it in the bugtracker under user center, so Matthew can get round to it.

Although I've got the hang of getting mine in order I'm just that little bit extra.

lol you are something else, shin taught me the technique and its easy

 

[Mootrucks]

Looking for more input from other people on this suggestion.

Also @Matthew thoughts?

 

100% support. Back when I had 50 miniranks I remember how tedious it was trying to arrange them how I wanted.

 

[Agnostic]

Support, I like this idea,

oh yeah, and make it so you can display 40 minis ^^

 

[DarkSpark]

makes sense to me. Scripting shouldn't be too hard. Maybe an additional database column somewhere which logs numerical data and this column is used when the database is called.
i.e.
SELECT MiniRanks FROM UserName (probably needs to be a where here that dictates if they have access to the ranks or not) ORDERBY UserSelectedOrdering

Then the miniranks page upon clicking apply would write the numerical data into the relevant fields

 

[Admires]

Support because it's my man @Mootrucks and anything he says goes.

So get to it you capitalist pigs.

 

Support its really messed up atm.

 

[Mootrucks]

This needs more love

 

This needs more love

i would support this if it were for miniranks, but since it's for mineranks i can't really support this. sorry!

 

[Mootrucks]

i would support this if it were for miniranks, but since it's for mineranks i can't really support this. sorry!

Can't believe I never noticed that typo, fixed.

 

@Matthew is this something that's possible?

 

[Im Solo]

This is true brilliance. This man miss going places with all of his great ideas. Proud of you once again @Mootrucks

 

It probably hasn't been done because it's not important. The MiniRank manager does store the order in which you arrange your MiniRanks but sometimes it looks like the forum shows them in the opposite order. It's really just a sorting issue I think.

So what you guys basically want is what you see is what you get in the MiniRank manager? That's fair.

Edit: Nevermind, there is already a bug tracker ticket I can use to queue this.