Make 2fa Mandatory In Specific Cases(Thoughts?)

[Add My Msn]

90% of sythe use Smart TVs.

 

[Tyler]

90% of sythe user Smart TVs.

exactly.

Bus you cant just make a suggestion and ignore people who big actual points to the table. shame on you.

 

[Pain]

exactly.

Bus you cant just make a suggestion and ignore people who big actual points to the table. shame on you.

I responded to what he said in the first page bud, that is a fairly minor issue compared to the concept of making hacked users activate 2fa.


if the general idea gets by then we can always improve & revise aswell as address specific issues as they arise(like having 2fa work for smart tv people).


Also i have no idea what a smart tv is so that's not helping me either lols.


& as for shame on me at least I'm trying to do something constructive, ever since you became a bond holder you've gone inactive as hell in terms of helping the forum itself so dont be talking about shame on me.

 

I put it here for community input but honestly only staff would likely get this suggestion, I put the thread here for people to point out logical errors In thought I might of made.


So far I've heard nothing but a bunch of bull lol, I couldnt care less if it gets denied or accepted but I know how many hacked accounts I alone report a day and new users on sythe are right to be scared of donors without 2fa at this point lol, I was mainly putting this out there so I could see what firez/staff think of it.


I've thought this through for a long long time, this is the first suggestion of several I've thought of & I think should be implemented.

Show some of your reports, and show a big enough sample to prove that the amount of hacked users is big enough for this to be mandatory. I feel while hackings are sparse, it's up to the user to keep their information secure. Should they choose not to use 2fa, it's up to them to accept the repercussions. After all, if they are hacked, they are responsible for any scams on their account.

It comes down to the matter that regular users are free to do what they please. If they don't want to use 2FA, don't believe in it, etc., they have the ability to do that. Should they not want to implement, what case do you have to say that they need to? It'll help keep them secure and such, but what if they don't? Is the punishment a ban? Also, how will the staff determine who is required to have 2FA and who is not?

& as for shame on me at least I'm trying to do something constructive, ever since you became a bond holder you've gone inactive as hell in terms of helping the forum itself so dont be talking about shame on me.

Also, this is a suggestion thread, for discussing this suggestion. Let's not make personal attacks and derail the purpose of discussing the suggestion at hand.

 

[Pain]

Show some of your reports, and show a big enough sample to prove that the amoount of hacked users is big enough for this to be mandatory. I feel while hackings are sparse, it's up to the user to keep their information secure. Should they choose not to use 2fa, it's up to them to accept the repercussions. After all, if they are hacked, they are responsible for any scams on their account.

http://prntscr.com/8z6ler


Happens enough to where I can send staff messages on skype and its typically done within 5 minutes or we figure out what the hell is going on.


I would say sythe is having at least 5-10 people hacked a day, because I can consciously go back at least 2 weeks and recall me reporting 5-10 people for being hacked.

I have to imagine others are doing similar things so thats where the figure is from.

 

http://prntscr.com/8z6ler


Happens enough to where I can send staff messages on skype and its typically done within 5 minutes or we figure out what the hell is going on.


I would say sythe is having at least 5-10 people hacked a day, because I can consciously go back at least 2 weeks and recall me reporting 5-10 people for being hacked.

I have to imagine others are doing similar things so thats where the figure is from.

Again, show that. Anyone can claim that they report 5-10 hacked users per day. If you're able to show that is indeed the case, then your argument has more merit. However, without adequate support to back up your claim, it is only that: a claim.

 

[Tyler]

Also i have no idea what a smart tv is so that's not helping me either lols.

Its nice that you give your opinion on stuff you are not educated in, speaks loads about your character

& as for shame on me at least I'm trying to do something constructive, ever since you became a bond holder you've gone inactive as hell in terms of helping the forum itself so dont be talking about shame on me.

I became a bond holder on January 14, 2015

Since then:
-Joined the CDT, and have been a large contributor to every major event
-Have single handily brought SOTM out of the ground and have run it since its beginning.
-had my first OMM application denied, and have my second one in voting process
- Have been the single bond holder among all bond holders who is not known for ripping off users for my own monetary gain.
-Wrote a guide on how to middleman trades properly, I'm working on getting it stickied in the middleman forums: http://www.sythe.org/computing/1891843-safe-middleman-guide.html

Approved suggestions I've made since I became a bond holder:
http://www.sythe.org/approved-suggestions/1813669-f-q-helpful-sites-sticky-sports-fitness-forum.html
http://www.sythe.org/approved-suggestions/1892514-blade-bond-holders-thread-sticky.html
http://www.sythe.org/approved-suggestions/1891109-new-possible-sticky-lol-market.html
http://www.sythe.org/approved-sugge...e-rules-account-selling-darkscape-market.html
http://www.sythe.org/approved-suggestions/1811117-donor-dice-lounge-rules.html

reporting ban evaders/scammers:
http://www.sythe.org/report-scammer...pal-accounts-applying-detective-minirank.html
http://www.sythe.org/report-scammer...e-ban-evader-applying-detective-minirank.html
http://www.sythe.org/report-scammer...l-ban-evader-applying-detective-minirank.html
http://www.sythe.org/report-scammer-archive/1890206-knarf-ban-evader.html
http://www.sythe.org/report-scammer-archive/1890200-biggy-maul-ban-evader.html
http://www.sythe.org/report-scammer-archive/1889835-rs_ofu-ban-evader.html
http://www.sythe.org/report-scammer...tersandrspsgold-extreme-easy-skype-match.html

Fucking educate yourself.

 

[ASAPgang]

Let's not make this a dick measuring contest... Not everyone has access to a smart phone, simple as that. If by chance they do have access to a smart phone, then maybe the user will be asked to activate 2FA.

The user who is hacked is responsible to pay back the members who were scammed whilst their account was hijacked. If this doesn't encourage someone to activate 2FA then idk what will.

 

[Hostblapstat]

Easy growth?


You mean the 1% of users that are hacked & violated is what you want to GROW, those are the people you want to make it easier on to get back into sythe.org?


Also what in the world are u talking about the "free market"? I'm asking for KNOWN USERS THAT HAVE BEEN HACKED TO HAVE TO APPLY 2FA BEFORE COMING BACK, You think its better to let them come back without 2fa and get hacked and 10 people get scammed? This isnt a free market decision I've thought it through for a long time, this is a security precaution that has major upside.


Your comment makes 0 sense.

I support this 100, if they've been hacked before 2fa should be mandatory. Why risk another hacking/scam. Also this would most likely put an end to people who fake being hacked because im pretty sure people do that.

 

[Time To Buy]

Requested close.

 

[Dave]

For the record, it is mandatory in some cases, for example all staff and OMMs need to have a 2fa Skype and Sythe account, I know that's not exactly what you meant but this in some sense aids in some potentially huge damage