LOL skele master

[hm0ng]

skele master chat, that is.. I don't want to add your stupid msn, thanks.

http://www.sythe.org/member.php?u=252588

 

[1234567ASDF]

exposed.

 

[Skele]

http://www.sythe.org/showpost.php?p=6475341&postcount=5

http://sythe.org/showpost.php?p=5794731&postcount=10

 

[1234567ASDF]

Im sure that's not his only accounts.

 

[XSafire]

 

[Skele]

Im sure that's not his only accounts.

Based on your sig, I believe you have information that is of importance to me.

PM or Ban. Your choice.

 

[1234567ASDF]

PM sent. Remember that this is top secret information and if anything is exposed, the FBI WILL be in contact.

 

[Lukef555]

exposed.

 

[Skele]

PM sent. Remember that this is top secret information and if anything is exposed, the FBI WILL be in contact.

I have replied with my analysis.

 

[1234567ASDF]

After reviewing your analysis, I found it to be very abstract.

You see:

Let X and Y be Banach spaces and T:Y→X be a bounded operator. In this note, we show first some operator versions of the dual relation between q-convexity and p-smoothness of Banach spaces case. Making use of them, we prove then the main result of this note that the two notions of uniform q-convexity and uniform p-smoothness of an operator T introduced by J. Wenzel are actually equivalent to that the corresponding T-modulus δT of convexity and the T-modulus ρT of smoothness introduced by G. Pisier are of power type q and of power type p, respectively. This is also an operator version of a conbination of a Hoffman's theorem and a Figiel-Pisier's theorem. As their application, we show finally that a recent theorem of J. Borwein, A.J. Guirao, P. Hajek and J. Vanderwerff about q-convexity of Banach spaces is again valid for q-convexity of operators.

 

[Granitmaul0]

After reviewing your analysis, I found it to be very abstract.

You see:

Let X and Y be Banach spaces and T:Y→X be a bounded operator. In this note, we show first some operator versions of the dual relation between q-convexity and p-smoothness of Banach spaces case. Making use of them, we prove then the main result of this note that the two notions of uniform q-convexity and uniform p-smoothness of an operator T introduced by J. Wenzel are actually equivalent to that the corresponding T-modulus δT of convexity and the T-modulus ρT of smoothness introduced by G. Pisier are of power type q and of power type p, respectively. This is also an operator version of a conbination of a Hoffman's theorem and a Figiel-Pisier's theorem. As their application, we show finally that a recent theorem of J. Borwein, A.J. Guirao, P. Hajek and J. Vanderwerff about q-convexity of Banach spaces is again valid for q-convexity of operators.

 

[wombakage]

Move this to sfa plZ

 

[x⁹]

After reviewing your analysis, I found it to be very abstract.

You see:

Let X and Y be Banach spaces and T:Y→X be a bounded operator. In this note, we show first some operator versions of the dual relation between q-convexity and p-smoothness of Banach spaces case. Making use of them, we prove then the main result of this note that the two notions of uniform q-convexity and uniform p-smoothness of an operator T introduced by J. Wenzel are actually equivalent to that the corresponding T-modulus δT of convexity and the T-modulus ρT of smoothness introduced by G. Pisier are of power type q and of power type p, respectively. This is also an operator version of a conbination of a Hoffman's theorem and a Figiel-Pisier's theorem. As their application, we show finally that a recent theorem of J. Borwein, A.J. Guirao, P. Hajek and J. Vanderwerff about q-convexity of Banach spaces is again valid for q-convexity of operators.

am I the only one seeing this?

 

[Skele]

am I the only one seeing this?

 

[1234567ASDF]

x9, you are win. I love you. Call me