I
Inventor
Guest
This topic was brought up on a local concert goers forum I frequent and I thought it would be a great thing to discuss as well as debate here. This is not a thread about "music" in general so please do not move this thread. It is about the effect known as auto tune and its effect on the economy as well as society in this day and age. It certainly has a major impact in our current culture.
For those who don't know what Auto-Tune, here is the Wikipedia article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auto-Tune
Some thoughts against Auto-Tune:
The sound is fluctuated in such a robotic and unpleasant way.
The effect either makes people sound like a robot or "fixes" vocals in an unnatural way. I argue that although it can make for an "error free" performance vocal wise for a singer or musician, respect is lost. The art is therefore tainted.
It's like having a beautiful painting, taking the colors and making them "modern art" by forming a box of some sort.
It may be pleasant to some but I admire the challenge and creativity involved with a painting. I also feel the same way about a song.
Respect tends to be gaged based on some sort of obstacle or challenge that eventually is overcome in a fully positive way.
The obstacle is the painting. It can either be a colorful square or a beautiful woman with long hair.
What effect does this have on our economy? Things are processed and therefore lose value. Gwen Stefani can make a hit song in 20 minutes instead of weeks just to get it right. The radio plays that song that took 20 minutes to make and suddenly everyone's listening to it. Once it's garbage they keep playing it and throw in another 20 minute song.
Instead of using quality pieces of art from a band/singer/songwriter/musician they need to have a songwriter that writes the songs all ahead of time with the newest lingo and then have some teen popstar with a face people know sing it just for people to enjoy it.
I'm sorry for derailing the original thread.. Just making a few points. Feel free to add.
For those who don't know what Auto-Tune, here is the Wikipedia article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auto-Tune
Some thoughts against Auto-Tune:
The sound is fluctuated in such a robotic and unpleasant way.
The effect either makes people sound like a robot or "fixes" vocals in an unnatural way. I argue that although it can make for an "error free" performance vocal wise for a singer or musician, respect is lost. The art is therefore tainted.
It's like having a beautiful painting, taking the colors and making them "modern art" by forming a box of some sort.
It may be pleasant to some but I admire the challenge and creativity involved with a painting. I also feel the same way about a song.
Respect tends to be gaged based on some sort of obstacle or challenge that eventually is overcome in a fully positive way.
The obstacle is the painting. It can either be a colorful square or a beautiful woman with long hair.
What effect does this have on our economy? Things are processed and therefore lose value. Gwen Stefani can make a hit song in 20 minutes instead of weeks just to get it right. The radio plays that song that took 20 minutes to make and suddenly everyone's listening to it. Once it's garbage they keep playing it and throw in another 20 minute song.
Instead of using quality pieces of art from a band/singer/songwriter/musician they need to have a songwriter that writes the songs all ahead of time with the newest lingo and then have some teen popstar with a face people know sing it just for people to enjoy it.
I'm sorry for derailing the original thread.. Just making a few points. Feel free to add.




