leanbean901 mad with warnings?

[FireZ]

I didn't accuse him of being a scammer once, you're all missing the point.





It wasn't an accusation, also: I provided proof on the report a player section where I was told to previously when something of this sort happened. Which was followed up and TWC'd by Unb4nn3d

Accusing of a twc is the same thing as accusing as a scammer. Without a link to your RASC thread then you are accusing and it will be deleted.

 

It wasn't an accusation, also: I provided proof on the report a player section where I was told to previously when something of this sort happened. Which was followed up and TWC'd by Unb4nn3d

In future cases, just let the report you made be processed. If it's correct, he'll be given a TWC, and you don't have to worry about posting yourself.

Preemptively posting before your report has been looked at isn't necessary.

If it was an infraction, I'd say that it could be reversed in this case, but it's just a warning, I don't see the problem.

 

[FireZ]

Warnings mean nothing, they dont count against you. Hope you have learned how these things are handled.

 

FTR: I am one of those mods (or maybe the only one?) who tends to post short responses on suggestions threads. I don't agree with the "I support = spam" rule in general and apart from that I'd like to think that at this point as one of the veterans on staff my word holds some weight. The rule is ridiculous by the way. "Support" is spam but "Support, it sounds like a great idea and would be very helpful to x." is not. The rule really only applies when someone is spamming the suggestions section with 1 word posts in the sole attempt to gain postcount - something that rarely, if ever, happens anymore.