Keeping track

[Karl]

This thread is literally about me paying back, did you read the OP lol?

 

[funbox]

Other DNT users are paying back and getting their DNTs lifted. I don't see why this case would be different.

Negative exclusionary attitudes just push people away and make repayment less likely.

I'm not here to argue about DNT. I alongside others completely disagree with it but in the end you can delete all the rules, it's your decision.

4 years ago Karl scammed Arcus wether intentionally or not doesn't really fucking matter. A year later he states on a private server he still has no money to even think about repaying.

3 years later we hear nothing but since he posted a thread we're supposed to believe him without any confirmation from Arcus about any payment plans or whatnot.

And as your last statement, this excuse of a human being didn't have any intention of paying him back the last 4 years, I'm sure it's this forum user's fault for 'pushing him away' from doing any repayment /s.

 

[jackthehackm8]

Moved back to Yugioh idiot try again

Jk that game is broken af in 2016. My deck is from 2005

2005 had better cards than this meta.

P O T O F G R E E D
M O N S T E R R E B O R N
H E A V Y S T O R M

 

[I Bleed Duke Blue]

2005 had better cards than this meta.

P O T O F G R E E D
M O N S T E R R E B O R N
H E A V Y S T O R M

So true, there were a lot of ways to win, but it was simplistic and satisfying. Now you have XYZ summoning (What the fuck am I doing math here?) Pendulum summoning, all this summoning IDK WTF it means. Synchro monsters. MFW @Niki played Blue Eyes White Dragon and got laughed at cuz he's worthless now.

Yugioh got cucked harder than EOC cucked Runescape.

 

I'm not here to argue about DNT. I alongside others completely disagree with it but in the end you can delete all the rules, it's your decision.

4 years ago Karl scammed Arcus wether intentionally or not doesn't really fucking matter. A year later he states on a private server he still has no money to even think about repaying.

3 years later we hear nothing but since he posted a thread we're supposed to believe him without any confirmation from Arcus about any payment plans or whatnot.

And as your last statement, this excuse of a human being didn't have any intention of paying him back the last 4 years, I'm sure it's this forum user's fault for 'pushing him away' from doing any repayment /s.

And when he and other DNT users do repay what are you going to say then

 

[Laptop65]

And when he and other DNT users do repay what are you going to say then

if*

If they do pay back all their debts, they will still have that cloud hovering over their head, but at least the scammed money is paid back.

 

[T V]

if*

If they do pay back all their debts, they will still have that cloud hovering over their head, but at least the scammed money is paid back.

might*

 

[SuF]

why dont you use your own safe

yeah he should totes buy a safe

 

[SuF]

Actions speak a hell of a lot louder than words, and thats all this self-righteous nonsense is. He's had a long time to make shit right, if he needs pressure to do it then he's still a worthless piece of shit. $50-100 isnt shit compared to what he stole. In the YEARS it's been he could of gotten a fucking degree, a trade a skill to further himself and his value upon society. He could of done something, but no he continued to be a piece of shit and work menial job to menial job (lets be real, there was probably no menial job #1), that or hes just so incredibly irresponsible with money that he cant save any. Does it matter really?

If you fuck up, own it. Nut up. Wah I'm a gambling pussy with no self control so I fucked over people I called friends.

he didn't steal anything you retard

 

[SuF]

I'm not here to argue about DNT. I alongside others completely disagree with it but in the end you can delete all the rules, it's your decision.

4 years ago Karl scammed Arcus wether intentionally or not doesn't really fucking matter. A year later he states on a private server he still has no money to even think about repaying.

3 years later we hear nothing but since he posted a thread we're supposed to believe him without any confirmation from Arcus about any payment plans or whatnot.

And as your last statement, this excuse of a human being didn't have any intention of paying him back the last 4 years, I'm sure it's this forum user's fault for 'pushing him away' from doing any repayment /s.

he didn't scam anyone you retard. arcus took a risk lending karl money that he might not be able to pay back. he wasn't able to pay it back since he went bankrupt. Karl is under no moral or legal obligation to pay Arcus back. you are literally retarded

 

[nodnarbusn]

he didn't steal anything you retard

Nice meme

 

he didn't scam anyone you retard. arcus took a risk lending karl money that he might not be able to pay back. he wasn't able to pay it back since he went bankrupt. Karl is under no moral or legal obligation to pay Arcus back. you are literally retarded

 

he didn't scam anyone you retard. arcus took a risk lending karl money that he might not be able to pay back. he wasn't able to pay it back since he went bankrupt. Karl is under no moral or legal obligation to pay Arcus back. you are literally retarded

Well it would be morally wrong if he didn't pay back the debut? So doesn't that mean he is under moral obligation to pay it back. Saying that we all have different morals so.....

 

[SuF]

Well it would be morally wrong if he didn't pay back the debut? So doesn't that mean he is under moral obligation to pay it back. Saying that we all have different morals so.....

arcus took a risk and that risk came back to bite him. if karl had the means to pay him back and he didn't, that would be one thing but he is a poor fuck

 

[funbox]

he didn't scam anyone you retard. arcus took a risk lending karl money that he might not be able to pay back. he wasn't able to pay it back since he went bankrupt. Karl is under no moral or legal obligation to pay Arcus back. you are literally retarded

"moral obligation"

So there's nothing "wrong" in asking your "friend" at the time for a loan you money which after 4 yours have clearly shown no intention to repay apart from attention posts.

Also don't even bother trying to use the "legality" aspect, when it's completely irrelevant to a forum that's almost only bound on morals.

Thank fuck you're not staff.

And when he and other DNT users do repay what are you going to say then

Care to list how many users have DNT and how many have repayed excluding the two that where doing it before DNT was ever released?

Also you're still speaking like it's certain he'll repay hmm.

 

you're a fucking retard @SuF holy shit, lemme hold 2 stacks for a min since i'm under no moral or legal obligation to pay you back homie

 

Care to list how many users have DNT and how many have repayed excluding the two that where doing it before DNT was ever released?

Greater than zero.

Also you're still speaking like it's certain he'll repay hmm.

You're speaking like its certain no repayment will occur... A really foolish opinion which will backfire. Even partial repayment will invalidate your position then all you'll have is how much of a dick you were.

 

[Lean]

Shut the fuck up.

 

[T V]

Also don't even bother trying to use the "legality" aspect, when it's completely irrelevant to a forum that's almost only bound on morals.

Ethics probably is more accurate. But the site's owner seems confident "the legality aspect" is relevant: "We needed to slim down staff anyways" - Big Rich 2k16

Also you're still speaking like it's certain he'll repay hmm.

Why is invective a desirable alternative?

 

[Lean]

Stop hating on my boy Rich, he's trying his best to suit everyones needs ok? If you don't like it, don't use the site