K9E5 - K & R Account Building Services

[GZ AIO]

I don't have discord nomore God told me salt was the 1 that leaked my kids is pictures to everyone I deleted my discord cause pointless carrying on with it
So dunno if you can un delete a discord account

Why you lying. Your discord account ain't even deleted.
imgur.com

Top is you, bottom is an actual deleted user lol.

 

[K9E5]

Why you lying. Your discord account ain't even deleted.
imgur.com

Top is you, bottom is an actual deleted user lol.

Wait it's not deleted I clicked for it to delete I even have the email for it and after that I uninstalled discord

 

[K9E5]

My bad it's been deleted soon

 

I have issued @K9E5 a 3 month ban for scamming and they will remain with a DNT. @K9E5 will remain banned/DNT'd regardless if this debt is paid by his former co-owner, since his intentions in this report are pretty clear.


@DontbesoSalty -

1. Did you post pictures of @K9E5's kids?
2. Please let me know if you intend on issuing a refund here, as you will be held liable for this debt as well.

In conclusion,

@DontbesoSalty
@K9E5 / @DontbesoSalty - you will need to refund @myturtles a total of $219.34.
Both of your accounts will receive a DNT until this is resolved.

 

[DontbesoSalty]

I did not post pictures of his kid . I posted a screenshot of his Facebook profile. What everybody else in the group chat did with it is none of my concern/fault.

Yeah I guess over time I’ll pay back godma, since you guys are not going to hold Reaper liable even tho he was coworker and founder of Kyle’s server long before I .
On that note, why aren’t you guys holding and liablity on reaper? I mean he was there for th deposit ? The majority of the ticket he sent probably twice as many messages as I? Told them right after the payment thank you for your business ? Was much more involved n the making of the deal?

Why am I the only one being held liable .

realistically shouldn’t I not be held liable for the 57$ debt that god paid while I was active co owner ? And reaper be held liable for the portion he was coowner for? I don’t understand why I am the only person here being fucked becus we clearly see kyle will have zero intention of paying anybody back . But im not the only person involved in this report either . Just the only one being punished

 

[DontbesoSalty]

I was coowner for about 3 weeks and this was a trade that had lasted for multiple months before I even joined

Reaper was actually co owner and confounder much longer then I .

 

• @Tyler Morris (reaper) had left the business before the issue with the replacement account arose, which was part of the deciding factor of the refund ruled in this report.
• @DontbesoSalty was aware of the situation when he was tagged in the ticket on October 20, 2024.
• @DontbesoSalty parted ways with the business very shortly before the report was made.

With the above in mind, @DontbesoSalty you will be held liable for the debt of $219.34.
Please let me know if you plan to issue a refund here.


August 25th
The initial trade agreement was made between the sellers @K9E5 / @Tyler Morris and the buyer @myturtles.

Spoiler

August 26th
@K9E5 notifies @myturtles that one of the accounts has been locked.

Spoiler

August 28th
@K9E5 states an additional two accounts were locked.

Spoiler

https://s11.gifyu.com/images/Syywl.png

October 21st
@K9E5 notifies @myturtles that @DontbesoSalty is his new business partner, and that @Tyler Morris is no longer a part of the business.

Spoiler

November 3rd
@K9E5 notifies @myturtles that giran replaced one of he locked accounts.

Spoiler

November 14th
@myturtles notifies @K9E5 and @DontbesoSalty that the account that was given to him as a replacement for one of the locked accounts was sold to someone else.

Spoiler

November 15th
@K9E5 confirms that the replacement account was taken back.

Spoiler

 

[DontbesoSalty]

So even though i did not even do anything, and I never saw a single penny of the money, and did not scam anybody, i will pay it back. I have been talking to @myturtles and were going to do a sort of payment plan to get it paid off.

I think its absolutely unjust along with the majority of the community involved how this ruling has been cast down upon me. I mean even @myturtles doesnt think i should be the one found at fault here by his NUMEROUS and multiple attempts at advocating my innocence and getting you to over-turn the ruling, to no success. (Which i really appreciate buddy)

Pretty much I'm just the scape goat and you guys are making a example of me for being co-owners with somebody who i did not know was a piece of shit . Esp. since there was another co-owner involved, and he's not being found at fault AT ALL even though he's directly present and active in the conversation during and after the deal has been made and paid. Its not very fair is all. Doesn't quite make sense to me, but it doesn't really sound like there's any talking sense into the mods here and they don't really care to cast judgement in a fair way so that only those who are responsible have to pay for their actions. They cast it upon only who they can when they know the direct offender wont be paying their dues. So i will just have to pay for somebody else's actions and bear their consequences.

Just Doesnt Make Sense. I guess you guys just needed to make a example of somebody, and im that guy.

 

[GZ AIO]

So even though i did not even do anything, and I never saw a single penny of the money, and did not scam anybody, i will pay it back. I have been talking to @myturtles and were going to do a sort of payment plan to get it paid off.

I think its absolutely unjust along with the majority of the community involved how this ruling has been cast down upon me. I mean even @myturtles doesnt think i should be the one found at fault here by his NUMEROUS and multiple attempts at advocating my innocence and getting you to over-turn the ruling, to no success. (Which i really appreciate buddy)

Pretty much I'm just the scape goat and you guys are making a example of me for being co-owners with somebody who i did not know was a piece of shit . Esp. since there was another co-owner involved, and he's not being found at fault AT ALL even though he's directly present and active in the conversation during and after the deal has been made and paid. Its not very fair is all. Doesn't quite make sense to me, but it doesn't really sound like there's any talking sense into the mods here and they don't really care to cast judgement in a fair way so that only those who are responsible have to pay for their actions. They cast it upon only who they can when they know the direct offender wont be paying their dues. So i will just have to pay for somebody else's actions and bear their consequences.

Just Doesnt Make Sense. I guess you guys just needed to make a example of somebody, and im that guy.

I can confirm we are in talks of a repayment plan.

-Fuck Kyle.

 

Zulu edit: The debt owed to @myturtles has been repaid by @DontbesoSalty
https://s7.gifyu.com/images/SGvD3.png
https://s7.gifyu.com/images/SGvDw.png

_____________________________

@DontbesoSalty I appreciate that you are willing the cover the debt here, however there is additional information that confirms that you did in fact send pictures of another user's family in a group chat on discord (proof in deleted above for staff). This will warrant a 1 month ban.

Disclosure of Others' Personal Information: Posting someone's information such as private emails, private social media accounts, addresses, phone numbers, private photos, etc. without explicit consent from that person will result in a 1 month ban and a DNT.

• This rule still applies if the information is publicly available or was posted by its owner on Sythe/Discord.

As co-owner of the business, you will receive the same punishment as @K9E5 for his actions in this report (scamming), which warrants a 3 month ban.

After one month has elapsed, and if/when the debt of $219.34 is paid, you can request a pardon and explain this in the dispute.

Businesses/Partnerships: Anyone running a business or partnered service implicitly agrees to share responsibility for the actions of their co-owners, as well as any workers they employ while the worker is on shift and acting on behalf of the business.

• If a partner or worker scams, all owners of the business will be banned until the debt is repaid. Workers, however, are not liable for anyone's actions but their own.