Formerly known as JoshuaG
Just a friendly reminder
- Thread starter Josh
- Start date
spokesman
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2012
- Sythe Gold
- 1,154
- Messages
- 10,442
Bound to happen
Reality is perception
glad you admit it
wait wait wait, didn't yousuck try back him up lol.
Formerly known as JoshuaG
Just another friendly reminder that you tried disputing on behalf of a scammer
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2013
- Sythe Gold
- 1,828
- Messages
- 8,853
no i reported him and got him his original ban, if by backing him up you mean in 1 post i said i hadn't heard anything bad about him then ye sure
ghast tried disputing to get him unbanned tho h4h4 ghast noob
spokesman
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2012
- Sythe Gold
- 1,154
- Messages
- 10,442
Anticipated this would happen if his pardon failed. The situation called for it unfortunately. Lack of opportunity + Upset + Malevolence = Vindictive behavior.
We see it happen all the time when users are banned, or pardons fail for incidents non related to scamming. E.g., accounts are recovered, payments are reversed, goods are taken, etc. Can't really expect banned users who didn't have much to lose to have upstanding principles.
Ddosing is one of those things that vary from mild to excessive, and also waver from white/grey to blackhat. Absolving users from the act when not proven to be for blackhat purposes is wacky. All situations are treated the same despite the way the rule is written. I wasn't in favor of this, so I used his case to test if the loophole in the rules would prove effective.
If you knew sythe was going to come to an end? How many of you would scam? I'd say many. A selective group of others wouldn't in hopes of the website returning, and others who don't participate in the market aren't left with any options. Anyone is capable of scamming. It all comes down to "is it worth it?".
After the Dali Lama situation, I decided not to quarrel with account affairs other than my own.
Tl;dr anyone is capable of scamming.
We see it happen all the time when users are banned, or pardons fail for incidents non related to scamming. E.g., accounts are recovered, payments are reversed, goods are taken, etc. Can't really expect banned users who didn't have much to lose to have upstanding principles.
Ddosing is one of those things that vary from mild to excessive, and also waver from white/grey to blackhat. Absolving users from the act when not proven to be for blackhat purposes is wacky. All situations are treated the same despite the way the rule is written. I wasn't in favor of this, so I used his case to test if the loophole in the rules would prove effective.
If you knew sythe was going to come to an end? How many of you would scam? I'd say many. A selective group of others wouldn't in hopes of the website returning, and others who don't participate in the market aren't left with any options. Anyone is capable of scamming. It all comes down to "is it worth it?".
After the Dali Lama situation, I decided not to quarrel with account affairs other than my own.
Tl;dr anyone is capable of scamming.
And that's why you don't buy accounts from people without 20k vouches
Reality is perception
It's sad to see. People who scam are all about the short term. Think long term, and your future, and every single reason you come up with points to being legit. There is no incentive to scam if you're thinking about the future.
Legend
- Joined
- May 9, 2014
- Sythe Gold
- 10,918
- Messages
- 45,372
100% true, people just don't realise that.
inb4scamquit
A Beautiful Soul and a Heart of Gold. <3
I remember that situation happened when gambling was being removed. Myself, 1 other rank for sure ('cos he was like a robot) and possibly 2-4 others out of the many ranks, didn't scam, the rest scam quit so hard.
Sad that people can switch up so fast.