• Log in or sign up for an account here: https://www.sythe.org/login

jena 6

Mad-moose

Forum Addict

Banned
Joined
Jun 27, 2007
Sythe Gold
0
Messages
494
Im surprised nobody brought this up, but it's a good example of racism.

Jena 6, the 6 African American teens that were trialled for second degree murder

f you don't know who the Jena 6 are, you are not alone. The first I heard about the black high school teens being railroaded through the Louisiana criminal justice system was last week when I received an email urging me to wear black Thursday the 20th in their support.
ADVERTISEMENT

The first Sean Hannity heard about it was last night when Reverend Al was trying to bring it up and Hannity assumed he was talking about Megan Williams, the young black woman who was tortured and sexually assaulted by those crazy hillbillies in West Virginia. Cryptkeeper Colmes tried to explain but as usual Hannity didn't hear a word he said.

The Jena 6 case began last fall when a new black student to the mostly white, rural Louisiana town of Jena sat under the "white tree," so called because it was the place where the white kids at school congregated.

The next day three white boys on the rodeo team hung three nooses from the tree.

The white boys were only given an in-school suspension, their act deemed no more than a "prank."

The day after that several of the school's black high school football stars organized a peaceful silent protest under the tree. The school freaked, called in the police and the next day Reed Walters, the local D.A., addressed the school. There, he is reported to have looked at the black kids in the audience, waved his pen in the air and said, "With a stroke of this pen, I can make your life disappear."

The football season was a good one for Jena and for a few months there was relative quiet in the town. Then on November 30th, a wing of the high school was burned down. Whites thought it was blacks and the blacks assumed it was the whites.

The always excellent Wade Goodman of NPR reported what happened next:

"The next night, 16-year-old Robert Bailey and a few black friends tried to enter a party attended mostly by whites. When Bailey got inside, he was attacked and beaten. The next day, tensions escalated at a local convenience store. Bailey exchanged words with a white student who had been at the party. The white boy ran back to his truck and pulled out a pistol grip shotgun. Bailey ran after him and wrestled him for the gun.
After some scuffling, Bailey and his friends took the gun away and brought it home. Bailey was eventually charged with theft of a firearm, second-degree robbery and disturbing the peace. The white student who pulled the weapon was not charged at all.

The following Monday, Dec. 4, a white student named Justin Barker was loudly bragging to friends in the school hallway that Robert Bailey had been whipped by a white man on Friday night. When Barker walked into the courtyard, he was attacked by a group of black students. The first punch knocked Barker out and he was kicked several times in the head. But the injuries turned out to be superficial. Barker was examined by doctors and released; he went out to a social function later that evening.

Six black students were arrested and charged with aggravated assault. But District Attorney Reed Walters increased the charges to attempted second-degree murder."

The first black kid to go to court, Mychal Bell, then 16, was tried as an adult and convicted by an all-white jury. He faced 22 years in prison. After an outcry the charges were reduced; however, tomorrow Mychal Bell is to be sentenced on the lesser charges.

The white kids who attacked Bailey the night before have not been charged with anything.

As always happens in these cases, the blacks say of course there has always been racism in this little town, and the whites say their little town is just like any other small town full of good, churchgoing folk.

What white Southerners still fail to realize is their complicity in some of the most vicious and effective terrorism the world has ever seen. Lynchings were only the most visible and brutal embodiments of a system to terrorize the black minority. A noose is a symbol the way a swastika is a symbol. A noose hanging from a tree in that context is an almost unimaginably vicious act. Those white teens, instead of being ashamed of their terrorist ancestry, reveled in the evil. The adults who are charged with the education of all the students deemed it merely a prank.

The scariest part of this ordeal is that you know these boys are the relatively lucky ones for whom publicity might spare them. How many other black lives are still thrown away at the whim of our broken justice system?
From:http://news.yahoo.com/s/huffpost/20070919/cm_huffpost/065010

This right here WAS RACISM and you cannot deny it unless you are racist your self

Post here what you think about the Jena 6

I personally think it was racism for one, one of the black teens were jumped by white teens at a party and no one got charged at ALL!
 
im not black and i still think that this is wrong... our law system is soooo jacked i hate the law i just went to court this morning for a speeding ticket and i wasnt even speeding
 
thank you..

and ya here in michigan they put speed bumps on the exits for today... and there were speed cops all over i-75
 
yep its racist i live near jena its realy scary alot of balck people are being mean...no offence
 
yep its racist i live near jena its realy scary alot of balck people are being mean...no offence

I would be pretty pissed at white people too if i lived in that town.
 
Two Factor Authentication User
Tier 1 Prizebox
I almost went to jena 6, I had free bus fare and shit but i freaked out. Since i missed basketball yesterday and i really need to go. Moreover at the beach were playing rap music and some getto people walk over and are like what that song, who sings...a like...I was laughing my ass off.

Or radios stations are all around this stuff, i personally did not think it was going to get an media coverage, however it did and lets see how it plays out.

While white people just want their town left alone rofl, racist bitches. I want to go but i wondered if i would get shot too. Keep this updated please
 
I would like to see this from a different source before making a judgment on it. It seems completely biased if you ask me. I think they should have been charged with attempted murder if the first blow knocked the guy out. If I'm fixing to beat someone's ass, after I knock them out I get up and leave, theres no need to beat a knocked out horse. Its fairly evident that the guys wanted to seriously hurt the guy, and if the prosecution can prove that they wanted to kill him, then send their asses to jail for it. I mean just how "superficial" can wounds given by blows that were powerful enough to knock a guy out be? One punch from one of the guys knocked him out, and you can kick something on the ground a hell of a lot harder than you can punch it standing up.

"The next night, 16-year-old Robert Bailey and a few black friends tried to enter a party attended mostly by whites. When Bailey got inside, he was attacked and beaten. The next day, tensions escalated at a local convenience store. Bailey exchanged words with a white student who had been at the party. The white boy ran back to his truck and pulled out a pistol grip shotgun. Bailey ran after him and wrestled him for the gun.
After some scuffling, Bailey and his friends took the gun away and brought it home. Bailey was eventually charged with theft of a firearm, second-degree robbery and disturbing the peace. The white student who pulled the weapon was not charged at all.

Ok the guy got beaten up at a party, I'll give him that. I doubt only "exchanging words" was going on at the store, since the black guy evidently had some friends with him. That would be reason enough for me to pull a gun out of my truck on somebody. If a guy has a few people with him, what else can you do? The white guy could have been protecting himself.

This article isn't very credible since it gives only one side of the story. No, I'm not racist, but I'm not going to side with the black guys just because they were black either.
 
Before you make yourself look at a dumbass, please refer to the section of the article on "nooses" located in the actual post.
Please read the entire post instead of skimming it.

So you're telling me if you're a Jew, and I drew a Swastika on the front of your school, then I only got suspended for it, you'd be happy?
No, you'd probably try to kick my ass (although with the sense you're showing me at the moment, I doubt you could).

You say the articled is biased, but you fail to see who provoked who to begin with.

If someone hung three nooses as a sign to harm me or my family, I'd beat the hell out of someone with the intent to seriously injure them too.

As for the superficial wounds, they were exactly what the damned article said, SUPERFICIAL. If you want to argue the point, go get yourself a P.h D. and examine the guy yourself. Until you do that, you have no support in saying that they were any worse than reported.

"I doubt only "exchanging words" was going on at the store, since the black guy evidently had some friends with him."

You're making assumptions.
God forbid you go to court, you won't last a moment.
And if its at a convenience store, then hey, moron, phone the police, it's smarter than trying to shoot them yourself...?

Before you make assumptions, before you try and disprove something you know nothing about, go find one of those so-called "non-biased papers" that you keep talking about.

I'd love to see one.
Welcome to America.
 
hmm, so did anyone end up murdering anybody?

shit though, still bloody racist
 
This proves that racism still exists...

I hate raciests...
I hope they don't get big charges like years...

So stupid the whites didnt get a charge
 
Two Factor Authentication User
Tier 1 Prizebox
Kenny not that simply. By the way racism will always exist, we have social racism is America. However these kids really do not deserve this, the got threated with ropes on a tree, that was suppose to be all white tree. So yeah, Good luck.

Edit actually story: At Jena High School, students of different races seldom sat together. Black students traditionally sat on bleachers near the auditorium, while white students sat under a large shade tree, referred to as the "white tree", in the center of the school courtyard.

During a school assembly on August 31, 2006, a black male freshman student asked permission from the principal to sit in the shade of the "white tree." According to the recounting of events given by U.S. Attorney Donald Washington, the question was posed in a "jocular fashion". The principal told the students they could "sit wherever they wanted." The freshman and his friends then sat under the tree.

The following morning, three nooses were discovered hanging from the tree. Jena's principal learned that three white students were responsible and recommended expulsion. The board of education overruled his recommendation, to which Superintendent Roy Breithaupt agreed. The punishment was reduced to three days of in-school suspension. The school superintendent was quoted as saying, "Adolescents play pranks. I don't think it was a threat against anybody. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jena_Six
 
Before you make yourself look at a dumbass, please refer to the section of the article on "nooses" located in the actual post.
Please read the entire post instead of skimming it.

So you're telling me if you're a Jew, and I drew a Swastika on the front of your school, then I only got suspended for it, you'd be happy?
No, you'd probably try to kick my ass (although with the sense you're showing me at the moment, I doubt you could).

I never said that what happened wasn't wrong. I merely said that the article was biased on a lot of things, and made an attempt to give the other side of the story.

You say the articled is biased, but you fail to see who provoked who to begin with.

Provocation doesn't warrant all the things that happened. Two wrongs don't make a right.

If someone hung three nooses as a sign to harm me or my family, I'd beat the hell out of someone with the intent to seriously injure them too.

And you would go to jail, like these guys are. The only difference is the damned NAACP is shitting their pants over it as if they've got nothing better to do, just because the guys were black, and they get media attention for it.

As for the superficial wounds, they were exactly what the damned article said, SUPERFICIAL. If you want to argue the point, go get yourself a P.h D. and examine the guy yourself. Until you do that, you have no support in saying that they were any worse than reported.

I never attempted to make a medical assessment, only the logical notion that if one punch from the guys can knock him out, how much more can all of them kicking him while he's on the ground do? I never said that the wounds weren't only superficial, only asked just how superficial could they be.

"I doubt only "exchanging words" was going on at the store, since the black guy evidently had some friends with him."

You're making assumptions.
God forbid you go to court, you won't last a moment.
And if its at a convenience store, then hey, moron, phone the police, it's smarter than trying to shoot them yourself...?

Of course I'm making assumptions. I doubt that someone brings friends with him to a convenience store only to "exchange words" with a a guy after he's been beat up. I would think that he was going there with those friends to beat that guy's ass for what happened at the party. The guy going for the gun in his truck could have been self-defense. In the event that he was fixing to get jumped, going for a gun would be a lot quicker than phoning the police.

Before you make assumptions, before you try and disprove something you know nothing about, go find one of those so-called "non-biased papers" that you keep talking about.

I'd love to see one.
Welcome to America.

No paper is completely non-biased, but some aren't as heavily biased as this one is. Also, I never tried to disprove that this happened, only to provide a bit of the other side of the story. I never said the things that happened weren't wrong.
 
Two Factor Authentication User
Tier 1 Prizebox
Wow, okay lets be fair, expelled the white kids too. I am tired of this dang social racism.
 
I never said that what happened wasn't wrong. I merely said that the article was biased on a lot of things, and made an attempt to give the other side of the story.



Provocation doesn't warrant all the things that happened. Two wrongs don't make a right.



And you would go to jail, like these guys are. The only difference is the damned NAACP is shitting their pants over it as if they've got nothing better to do, just because the guys were black, and they get media attention for it.



I never attempted to make a medical assessment, only the logical notion that if one punch from the guys can knock him out, how much more can all of them kicking him while he's on the ground do? I never said that the wounds weren't only superficial, only asked just how superficial could they be.



Of course I'm making assumptions. I doubt that someone brings friends with him to a convenience store only to "exchange words" with a a guy after he's been beat up. I would think that he was going there with those friends to beat that guy's ass for what happened at the party. The guy going for the gun in his truck could have been self-defense. In the event that he was fixing to get jumped, going for a gun would be a lot quicker than phoning the police.



No paper is completely non-biased, but some aren't as heavily biased as this one is. Also, I never tried to disprove that this happened, only to provide a bit of the other side of the story. I never said the things that happened weren't wrong.

Two wrongs don't make a right?
Let's not contradict American history.
British imposes taxes on the American's, so America kicks British out of the colonies, Natives were on the landmass first, so they attempt to kick the Americans out, Americans decide hell no and kick the Natives off their land....
I can't help but notice how many times our wrongs seem to be always right when it works in our favor.

Also, the mere fact that you said you were making assumptions invalidates your argument entirely, because in the "United States of America" where this is taking place, you can't justify arresting and/or prosecuting a person with assumptions and half-assed information.

But, nonetheless, I see where you're coming from, and I see what you mean by describing another side of the story.
Unfortunately, due to Louisiana's credibility, such a story won't be believed unless they come up with actual evidence.
 
Ofcourse that's racism but you gotta admit, the south never wanted to give it up in the first place. It's places like New York that have VERY strict anti racism laws. I'm personally white/russian and was jumped by a group of black kids outside my high school one time even though I didn't know any of them. Ofcourse I think that was fucked up and I have to admit I am a bit racist against blacks but not enough to actually have anything against them. For example: I think when a lot of black guys get in a group; you should really watch out cuz you don't know what's going to happen. I'm not saying I hate all black people and they should all die or anything. I'm just saying that I do look at them diffrent but I would never treat anyone inhumanely due to their skin color or heritage.
 
Runescape Gamblingrunescape gambling
Back
Top