Think about this:
If there is a creation, there must be a Creator.
If there is a Creator, He must be the Sustainer.
The Creator Cannot Create Himself.
If He is the sole Creator/Sustainer -- He must be ONE.
God must be one. Otherwise we would see great differences and competition between the gods if there were more than one -- Alone.
Do we agree that this is a creation? Or do we accept that nothing came out of nothing to form this entire universe?
This is a very clear message from Allah, in the Quran. Something does not come out of nothing. So, there must be something in existence already which created all that we know to exist. And that "something" needs to be called upon in times of need and thanksgiving.
As Allah has said in His Book: "I only created you all to worship Me Alone."
He also says that we are all being tested by Him with regard to our wealth, families, children and social status
http://www.scienceislam.com
And here shows how science is in the Quran and that the findings of all these scientists have allways been in the Quran:
http://www.freewebs.com/proofofislam/scienceinthequran.htm
it is because it must be isn't a valid arguement. i'm telling you, there is physical proof and fact to the big bang and it makes LOGICAL sense. a giant man in the sky shouting out orders is not LOGICAL.
Dying, like every other animal is LOGICAL
living in dreamland after dying is not LOGICAL
heaven, an afterlife, they're all created by mans own fear of death. if there was no hope for life after death, there would be little hope in life itself. you believe because you want to believe. you can't comprehend the direness of no longer being here.
onto your idea the quar'an is scientific:
Muslims believe that the Qur'an contains a message from an all-powerful, all-knowing, infallible being. If this is true then
it should not contain any errors, mistakes, or information that contradicts known facts about the universe. If even one error exists in the text of Islam's holy book then the claims of divine authorship and infallibility are not true. An objective evaluation of the Qur’an shows that
it contains numerous scientific and historical errors and it reflects a pre-scientific, 7th century view of the natural world.
Some apologists will contest these numerous scientific errors in the Qur'an by appealing to metaphor, alternative meanings, or phenomenological interpretations of the text. Even if we suppose that alternative explanations were possible in every case, the wording and content of the Qur'anic verses often mimic the popular mythology and unscientific misconceptions of the time in which they were recorded. The author of the Qur’an makes no clear or unambiguous statements that differentiate his understanding of the natural world from the common folklore of the people living in the 7th century.
If the Qur’an was delivered by an all-powerful, all-knowing being then he would have been able to foresee how such ambiguous and misleading statements would be understood by future generations and the doubts and confusions they would cause. This alone should be reason to reject any claims to its divine authorship.
this includes but is not limited to:
The believe man changed into apes (We know this, through evolution is LOGICAL to believe the other way round)
Animals being able to speak to humans
Mathematical errors which would have been true at the time of writing (2000-3000 years ago) which now prove wrong.
The earth is flat
Earth created before the stars
There are only 5 not 7 principal layers to the Earth's atmosphere, and likewise only 5 not 7 major layers to the Earth itself. Allah created 7 heavens to mimic earths layers.
The earth first formed around 9 billion years after the Big Bang. The Qur'an, however, repeats the prevailing middle eastern myth that the earth and universe were formed in six days.
The Qur’an state that humans were created instantaneously from mud or clay. Remember, Evolution wasn't around at the time, so they essentially took a creationist approach because they couldn't yet comprehend Evolution
The Qur’an and Hadith contains stories concerning the 'first humans' and how all people are descended from these two earliest ancestors. It states that humans were created in a garden and then brought to earth fully formed. This view of the origins of human life is clearly contradicted by the numerous fossils of pre-homosapien species that lived on earth for millions of years before modern humans first evolved. Again, 3000 years ago Evolution/Dinosaurs were not existent in humanity's eyes, so this would reflect the view of someone who again didn't know and instead wrote what they assumed logical at the time.
+30000 more errors i'll send you on request.
would an all knowledgeable being really make the same mistakes as a middle eastern man 3000 years ago? ironic that.
