Virtualtrader1 dishonest vouching - again

Following up on: Virtualtrader1 dishonest vouching @virtualtrader1 still has some changes to make following @Pirate's last warning. He's also had several people reporting his vouch thread so I thought I'd try to summarize:

This pingy vouch is allegedly for 300m but links to a searchy vouch for 100m (on his own vouch thread, at that)

He faked the gold amount in this vouch as well (see vouch #25 from the pre-edit version of the OP)

+ half the vouches from his OP do not link to their respective posts (the vouches seem to exist so this is more of a linking error, but it IS a rule, so @virtualtrader1 if you could update things that would be great - thanks)

 

The admin or mod in here deleted all the so called "fake vouches" that arent even fake that your talking about.. and i faked a gold amount? where??? pingys vouch for 300m?? what?? and what links to a searchy vouch for 100m?? idk what ur talking about seriously, like for real what is all those accusations for? im literally laughing, ive never heard such stupidity before

+half of my vouches doesnt link to their respective posts? what are you talking about????, @Pirate has changed everything that should have been changed on my profile, like for real, what is your problem? i understand pingys army of trolls are trying to get me banned because me and searchy trying to get pingy banned... but have they paid you to join them as well??

As a member of this forum i really feel ashamad for having a market mod like you in this forum seriously this is too ridiculous

 

As a follow-up to your post and my first reply, I will add a further and more detailed response step by step to your accusations now that I have time for it.

Vouch initially listed #29 was linked to the wrong link. I changed it.

The link from vouch #39 was missing. I added it.

Vouches listed #17 and #18 from my thread were the same. It was my mistake; I deleted the duplicate. Even though you didn't mention it in your post...

In one of the vouches, I had changed the quote to add the amount sold, because the buyer didn't mention it. It was only adding "100m". I edited it so that it corresponds to the exact quote (vouch #25 "sold him some osrs gp. Thank you mate! Easy and Fast!"). It was a pretty small transaction so I didn't see it as a fraud to add the amount that was actually sold. We're not talking about 500m+ otherwise I would have asked the buyer to edit his vouch.

Regarding Pingy's vouch, he had vouched me but deleted his post. So I tried to link it anyway because I saw that he did it too. I deleted it from my vouch list and vouch thread.

Now that those mistakes have been corrected, let me reply to your allegations.

"half the vouches from his OP do not link to their respective posts". After checking vouch by vouch, I found only 2 wrong links and 1 link missing, out of 65 vouches, you can see them above in this post. Can you please explain how this corresponds to your bold statement that half of my vouches are wrongly linked?

"He faked the gold amount in this vouch as well". As I said, I added the amount because I legit sold that amount and we're not talking about a huge trade. But I deleted it to be completely transparent. In the future, I'll ask people I trade with to edit their vouches if needed.

Talking about "dishonest vouching" seems like persecution not backed up by serious evidence. I currently have 65 vouches, all clearly linked, everything checked. Even before your comments, there were only a few minor mistakes, obviously not done on purpose. You make it sound like I'm tricking people. My vouch thread is completely legit and if you have so much time, I invite you to check it thoroughly and scroll through its 4 pages to verify yourself vouch by vouch.

But maybe you will consider that futile and puerile and finally admit that my vouch thread has no major issues.

Have a good day, may you become an admin some day!

 

@virtualtrader1
I'm a little surprised by how many errors you've managed to make in only "65 vouches" that you keep quoting.

Both on your original report: Virtualtrader1 dishonest vouching and this thread. For the record, editing vouches left by customers to add in amounts yourself is about the silliest thing you can possibly do - but since you've had an epiphany after both these reports, and corrected yourself, I'm going to let it slide.

If we see you again in this section for questionable/dodgy vouches, expect a very different outcome.