Infracted for expressing views not held my the majority

[basterache3]

It seems like my Parody article of an article on becauseimblack.com is considered bad for some odd reason.

If you are going to write an article to promote a group or culture, and then LIE 95% of the time in it, does that paint a very good picture of said group/cultre.

And furthermore, a clear parody (which I clearly called it in my first post) has more leeway with what it can get away with in legal terms (see dissalowing slander). Read up on Hustler Magazine v. Falwell.

I know this last statement here probably isn't gonna win any points with the mods, unless they see truth in it,

BUT I will post in anyways.

Someone replied to me that I portrayed blacks as theives while the original article was trying to make them seem equal.

The Original article supports my portrayal of said, as the woman who wrote the article (black) is STEALING credit for all those inventions. Nuff said?

 

[Tgump]

The article was incredibly racist, implying that all blacks are welfare drainers, a threat to society, etc. Also, the original article being incorrect does not give you the ground to produce another incorrect article. Appeal denied.