In reply to my last dispute....

[Unregistered Serotonin]

Firstly, please don't lock this one after one reply.
I was banned because it's "unlikely I have an imposter" but if you look at the trade screen shots http://puu.sh/ujZU.
The guy didn't join the chat saying it was me and he was selling an upgrade the person simply said they where me after being asked "are you serotonin from the forums" and were then given the 9m, that could have been anyone from the forum who added him for whatever reason. I cannot see how this can be viewed as means to ban someone, I didn't do anything wrong.

 

[Zerkerfist]

I don't think you fully read my reply on your last dispute: http://sythe.org/showthread.php?t=1398681.

It's true that the person who added him could have been anybody. But I find that extremely unlikely that a random person with a similar e-mail to yours would add him RIGHT after you happened to PRIVATELY message him offering to sell an upgrade. That is why he asks right away if you are Seretonin from the forums - because he was expecting you.

Like I said in the last dispute, I spent quite some time scouring through both of your posts on the day in question, and it's not like he posted on a sales thread of yours. That might explain why an impostor would add him on MSN - because somebody would have publicly seen that you intended to trade with him and tried to beat you to it. However, you didn't post anything at all about selling an upgrade that day, yet you saw him trying to buy one and then privately messaged him and offered to sell him one. He was then added by an e-mail address that is strikingly similar to your own, and went ahead with the trade as he was expecting you to add him. This bizarre scenario might be more likely if you were a well-known seller, but the chances of you having an impostor are quite unlikely.

In my eyes that is very suspicious and frankly, I don't believe your story. I can leave this here for another mod to take a look if you wish, but I think there is enough circumstantial evidence to warrant a ban.