- Joined
- Jan 15, 2006
- Sythe Gold
- 0
- Messages
- 6,989
Attempt 2 
Original Report by Fuzion LTD: http://www.sythe.org/showthread.php?t=912705
Essentially, Fuzion linked to a thread and accused Fatality of reselling an account that he had purchased.
Proof supplied:
The report was dismissed since Fuzion did not provide proof that he had purchased the account, apart from knowledge of the account name.
Fatality vouched for Fuzion's purchase of the account in this thread:
http://www.sythe.org/showthread.php?p=6423213#post6423213
Unfortunately, Fatality, like most recoverers, removes screenshots of the accounts from his threads after they're purchased. Thus, it remains to be shown that the account in question was, in fact, sniper w32.
Fortunately, Fatality missed an image when he went to delete them. The bank pic for the account Fuzion purchased was:
http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/2914/sniperbank.png
Note, the image is named "sniperbank", and - again - the account Fuzion claims to have bought was Sniper w32. Since both accounts are advertised as 99 hunt, are both 1 prayer, and have similar gold stacks, and since Fuzion knew the name of the account, I believe it's reasonable to conclude that Fuzion did buy the account Fatality was reselling 3 months later.
The remaining objection would be that Fuzion recovered the payment, causing Fatality to recover the account. It's a reasonable objection, since Fuzion's report screenshot does not show Fatality's response to the accusation. However, Fatality damns himself by saying while attempting to resell the account:
Assuming he sold Fuzion the account legitimately, and provided legitimate recovery info, he still would not be able to claim to be 'the first and only' owner of the account, even if Fuzion had recovered the payment. Thus, it would seem Fatality is guilty either of account recovery or of falsely advertising an at-risk account.
Fatality has been accused a couple other times of account recovery, but has offered refunds to get the reports closed. At the least, I think a TWC is appropriate.
Original Report by Fuzion LTD: http://www.sythe.org/showthread.php?t=912705
Essentially, Fuzion linked to a thread and accused Fatality of reselling an account that he had purchased.
Proof supplied:
The report was dismissed since Fuzion did not provide proof that he had purchased the account, apart from knowledge of the account name.
Fatality vouched for Fuzion's purchase of the account in this thread:
http://www.sythe.org/showthread.php?p=6423213#post6423213
Unfortunately, Fatality, like most recoverers, removes screenshots of the accounts from his threads after they're purchased. Thus, it remains to be shown that the account in question was, in fact, sniper w32.
Fortunately, Fatality missed an image when he went to delete them. The bank pic for the account Fuzion purchased was:
http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/2914/sniperbank.png
Note, the image is named "sniperbank", and - again - the account Fuzion claims to have bought was Sniper w32. Since both accounts are advertised as 99 hunt, are both 1 prayer, and have similar gold stacks, and since Fuzion knew the name of the account, I believe it's reasonable to conclude that Fuzion did buy the account Fatality was reselling 3 months later.
The remaining objection would be that Fuzion recovered the payment, causing Fatality to recover the account. It's a reasonable objection, since Fuzion's report screenshot does not show Fatality's response to the accusation. However, Fatality damns himself by saying while attempting to resell the account:
Assuming he sold Fuzion the account legitimately, and provided legitimate recovery info, he still would not be able to claim to be 'the first and only' owner of the account, even if Fuzion had recovered the payment. Thus, it would seem Fatality is guilty either of account recovery or of falsely advertising an at-risk account.
Fatality has been accused a couple other times of account recovery, but has offered refunds to get the reports closed. At the least, I think a TWC is appropriate.
