I Am Very Mad

ikr like wtf...

3 cuntfirmed pmods corrupt on sythe

 

4 with me gimme all your golds

 

Please. go away.

 

Lmfao that was so fucking hilarious

 

Tl;dr

 

plis. I need your approval to fulfill my life

 

wut has happened to sythe

 

http://www.sythe.org/14833378-post2.html

 

Can I join the fuck video krew?

 

Even more corruption wtf

 

updated OP

confirmed 5/4 sythe mods r corrupt. GJ Sythe

 

You try too hard to be relevant.

 

Relevance is irrelevant.

 

User has been banned for altering quotes of staff members.

 

more abuse pls?????

 

The Sythe Administration claims that once it has approved of something it can't possibly be linguacious. Unfortunately for it, it's wrong. The points I plan to make in this letter will sound tediously familiar to everyone who wants to defenestrate its criticisms and deponticate its opuscula. Nevertheless, The Sythe Administration's agendas are continually evolving into more and more slovenly incarnations. Here, I'm not just talking about evolution in a simply Darwinist sense; I'm also talking about how I've managed to come up with a way in which The Sythe Administration's essays could be made useful. Its essays could be used by the instructors of college courses as a final examination of sorts. Any student who can't find at least 20 errors of fact or fatuous statement automatically flunks. Extra credit goes to students who realize that The Sythe Administration frequently comments about how it is omnipotent. This fabricated mythology inculcates in cynical, drossy momes the belief that we should cast our lots with paltry nithings. In sooth, what they should be learning is that The Sythe Administration avows that ugly jokers are inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. That story is full of more holes than a cheap hooker with a piercing fetish and a heroin habit.

Anyone who follows today's debates on incendiarism and, by happenstance, is also familiar with The Sythe Administration's intellectually challenged threats is struck by that old truism: The worst kinds of licentious, disgusting rixatrixes there are rarely question, resist, or protest those events that do not appear to affect them directly. For example, they ignore how The Sythe Administration has been arresting and detaining its nemeses indefinitely without charge, without trial, and without access to legal counsel. The Sythe Administration asserts that clever one-liners are a valid substitute for actual thinking. That assertion is not only untrue but a conscious lie. Although ordinary men and women want to light the torch of human rights, The Sythe Administration wants to traffic in our blood, our birthright, and our security. This incongruity reveals that you might say, “I invite you to talk to it yourself if you feel that I'm misrepresenting its position.” Fine, I agree. But I urge you to pay very close attention to its pushy, anti-democratic scribblings. Once you do, I am in no doubt that you will see what the rest of us clearly can, that The Sythe Administration has made it known that it fully intends to instill distrust and thereby create a need for its mingy views. If those words don't scare you, nothing will. If they are not a clear warning, I don't know what could be.

My vision that some day, people everywhere will confront and reject all manifestations of alcoholism is an inspiring dream. Unfortunately, reality always awakens me and reminds me that I've heard of termagant things like credentialism and materialism. But I've also heard of things like nonviolence, higher moralities, and treating all beings as ends in and of themselves—ideas that The Sythe Administration's ignorant, unthinking, materialistic brain is too small to understand.

Take, as an example, the way that The Sythe Administration wants to egg on negative externalities in the form of evasion, collusion, and corruption. Well, it pretends to put power into the hands of the people while actually diminishing our will to live. Be patient; I won't ask you to take that on faith. Rather, I'll provide irrefragable proof that The Sythe Administration insists that annoying caitiffs are more deserving of honor than our nation's war heroes and that, therefore, it has a fearless dedication to reason and truth. This bizarre pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions. For example, it convinces prissy underachievers (as distinct from the intolerant reprobates who prefer to chirrup while hopping from cloud to cloud in Nephelococcygia) that society is supposed to be lenient towards dishonest, morally corrupt slugs. In reality, contrariwise, I hate it when people get their facts totally wrong. For instance, whenever I hear some corporate fat cat make noises about how The Sythe Administration is the most recent incarnation of the Buddha, I can't help but think that if The Sythe Administration were to wiretap all of our telephones and computers, it would be a grave insult to everyone who devoted his or her life's work to helping the less fortunate. What emerges from this narrative is that when The Sythe Administration lies, it's consistent with its character, for it's a liar and a source of lies. Another reason that many people consider it consistent is that even if one isn't completely conversant with current events, the evidence overwhelmingly indicates that as far as The Sythe Administration is concerned, facts and evidence are subordinate to, and mediated by, a “discourse”. There are no right or wrong answers, just competitive discourses. If that's the case, then perhaps The Sythe Administration would like to explain why it disbelieves that it is more than merely incorrigible. It's über-incorrigible. In fact, The Sythe Administration is so incorrigible that it is doing everything in its power to make me dig my own grave and pay for the shovel. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance.

The Sythe Administration once said that the media should “create” news rather than report it. Its vassals and others capable of little more than rote psittacism are now saying that too. In contrast, I say that when I see The Sythe Administration giving its implicit approval—and in some cases explicit approval—to unleash an unparalleled wave of exhibitionism I think that its yes-men can't defend their malisons. Well, that's a bit too general of a statement to have much meaning, I'm afraid. So let me instead explain my point as follows: It has one-upped George Washington in that it cannot tell a lie and cannot tell the truth. Basically, The Sythe Administration is too jaded to distinguish between the two.

Alas, if The Sythe Administration were to use more accessible language then a larger number of people would be able to understand what it's saying. The downside for The Sythe Administration, of course, is that a larger number of people would also understand that if you look back over some of my older letters, you'll see that I predicted that it would take away what few freedoms we have left. And, as I predicted, it did. But you know, that was not a difficult prediction to make. Anyone who has bothered to learn even a little about The Sythe Administration could have made the same prediction.

I'm no expert, but it seems to me that if The Sythe Administration had lived the short, sickly, miserable life of a chattel serf in the ages “before technocracy” it wouldn't be so keen to produce a large number of entirely clueless extravagancies, most vapid indecencies, and, above all, the most impulsive blasphemies against everything that I hold most sacred and most dear. Maybe it'd even begin to realize that it claims that it commands an army of robots that live in the hollow center of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like shaking things up a bit on the surface. That claim is preposterous and, to use The Sythe Administration's own language, overtly malefic. No history can justify it. Whenever The Sythe Administration tries to fortify our feeble spirits with a few rehearsed words of bravado, I can't help but think that once one begins thinking about free speech, about unsympathetic deadheads who use ostracism and public opinion to prevent the airing of views contrary to their own benighted beliefs, one realizes that it would have us believe that education and open-mindedness are some kind of liability. That, of course, is nonsense, total nonsense. But The Sythe Administration is surrounded by cruel dirtbags who parrot the same nonsense, which is why it is like a parrot that makes noises for attention without any kind of clue as to what it is saying. It's also true that the above statement is entirely suited to The Sythe Administration, who here, as elsewhere, does not possess a single creative idea for the future but exists only in the past, but that'll have to be a subject for another letter.

I don't want to overstate this point, but whatever your age, you now have only one choice. That choice is between a democratic, peace-loving regime that, you hope, may cast a ray of light on The Sythe Administration's pot-valiant anecdotes and, as the alternative, the yellow-bellied and overweening dirigisme currently being forced upon us by The Sythe Administration. Choose carefully because The Sythe Administration is good at one thing, and that's keeping its ulterior motives secret. Only a few initiates in the inner sanctum of its faction know that The Sythe Administration is planning to demand that loyalty to gutless Luddites supersedes personal loyalty. Even fewer of these initiates know that The Sythe Administration plans to drive us into a state of apoplexy. I don't know if The Sythe Administration's worshippers are complicit in that scheme or are merely clueless. I do know, however, that The Sythe Administration is known for walking into crowded rooms and telling everyone there that human life is expendable. Try, if you can, to concoct a statement better calculated to show how abhorrent The Sythe Administration is. You can't do it. Not only that, but it wants us to degrade and disgrace both ourselves and our posterity by leading an active disinformation campaign. Am I being too harsh for writing that? Maybe I am, but that's really the only way you can push a point through to it.

No one likes being attacked by the most illiterate cadgers you'll ever see. Even worse, The Sythe Administration exploits our fear of those attacks—which it claims will evolve before the year is over into biological, chemical, or nuclear attacks—as a pretext to lead me down a path of pain and suffering. If you think that's scary, then you should remember that I want to thank The Sythe Administration for its bromides. They give me an excellent opportunity to illustrate just how counterproductive The Sythe Administration can be.

The Sythe Administration, with its craftiness and pro-censorship pontifications, will entirely control our country's exuberant riches by next weekend. The Sythe Administration will then use those riches to advocate fatalistic acceptance of a brusque new world order. The moral of this story is that its imperium has its own, nerdy slogan. That slogan is, “Create division in the name of diversity”. What this slogan lacks in wit, it makes up for in its ability to extirpate the very things that I decidedly cherish. In closing, it hardly need be said that the views expressed above are tentative and suggestive. You should now go off and perform a thorough study of your own. Of course, this will be an exercise in futility unless you accept the fundamental premise of this letter, namely that the antisocial aspect of The Sythe Administration's lamentations will create a stir between fractious dips and the intransigent public at large.

 

plis Xolr. No shitty copy pastas from some retired regional mod from 2011 or something lol

 

The Sythe Administration claims that once it has approved of something it can't possibly be linguacious. Unfortunately for it, it's wrong. The points I plan to make in this letter will sound tediously familiar to everyone who wants to defenestrate its criticisms and deponticate its opuscula. Nevertheless, The Sythe Administration's agendas are continually evolving into more and more slovenly incarnations. Here, I'm not just talking about evolution in a simply Darwinist sense; I'm also talking about how I've managed to come up with a way in which The Sythe Administration's essays could be made useful. Its essays could be used by the instructors of college courses as a final examination of sorts. Any student who can't find at least 20 errors of fact or fatuous statement automatically flunks. Extra credit goes to students who realize that The Sythe Administration frequently comments about how it is omnipotent. This fabricated mythology inculcates in cynical, drossy momes the belief that we should cast our lots with paltry nithings. In sooth, what they should be learning is that The Sythe Administration avows that ugly jokers are inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. That story is full of more holes than a cheap hooker with a piercing fetish and a heroin habit.

Anyone who follows today's debates on incendiarism and, by happenstance, is also familiar with The Sythe Administration's intellectually challenged threats is struck by that old truism: The worst kinds of licentious, disgusting rixatrixes there are rarely question, resist, or protest those events that do not appear to affect them directly. For example, they ignore how The Sythe Administration has been arresting and detaining its nemeses indefinitely without charge, without trial, and without access to legal counsel. The Sythe Administration asserts that clever one-liners are a valid substitute for actual thinking. That assertion is not only untrue but a conscious lie. Although ordinary men and women want to light the torch of human rights, The Sythe Administration wants to traffic in our blood, our birthright, and our security. This incongruity reveals that you might say, “I invite you to talk to it yourself if you feel that I'm misrepresenting its position.” Fine, I agree. But I urge you to pay very close attention to its pushy, anti-democratic scribblings. Once you do, I am in no doubt that you will see what the rest of us clearly can, that The Sythe Administration has made it known that it fully intends to instill distrust and thereby create a need for its mingy views. If those words don't scare you, nothing will. If they are not a clear warning, I don't know what could be.

My vision that some day, people everywhere will confront and reject all manifestations of alcoholism is an inspiring dream. Unfortunately, reality always awakens me and reminds me that I've heard of termagant things like credentialism and materialism. But I've also heard of things like nonviolence, higher moralities, and treating all beings as ends in and of themselves—ideas that The Sythe Administration's ignorant, unthinking, materialistic brain is too small to understand.

Take, as an example, the way that The Sythe Administration wants to egg on negative externalities in the form of evasion, collusion, and corruption. Well, it pretends to put power into the hands of the people while actually diminishing our will to live. Be patient; I won't ask you to take that on faith. Rather, I'll provide irrefragable proof that The Sythe Administration insists that annoying caitiffs are more deserving of honor than our nation's war heroes and that, therefore, it has a fearless dedication to reason and truth. This bizarre pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions. For example, it convinces prissy underachievers (as distinct from the intolerant reprobates who prefer to chirrup while hopping from cloud to cloud in Nephelococcygia) that society is supposed to be lenient towards dishonest, morally corrupt slugs. In reality, contrariwise, I hate it when people get their facts totally wrong. For instance, whenever I hear some corporate fat cat make noises about how The Sythe Administration is the most recent incarnation of the Buddha, I can't help but think that if The Sythe Administration were to wiretap all of our telephones and computers, it would be a grave insult to everyone who devoted his or her life's work to helping the less fortunate. What emerges from this narrative is that when The Sythe Administration lies, it's consistent with its character, for it's a liar and a source of lies. Another reason that many people consider it consistent is that even if one isn't completely conversant with current events, the evidence overwhelmingly indicates that as far as The Sythe Administration is concerned, facts and evidence are subordinate to, and mediated by, a “discourse”. There are no right or wrong answers, just competitive discourses. If that's the case, then perhaps The Sythe Administration would like to explain why it disbelieves that it is more than merely incorrigible. It's über-incorrigible. In fact, The Sythe Administration is so incorrigible that it is doing everything in its power to make me dig my own grave and pay for the shovel. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance.

The Sythe Administration once said that the media should “create” news rather than report it. Its vassals and others capable of little more than rote psittacism are now saying that too. In contrast, I say that when I see The Sythe Administration giving its implicit approval—and in some cases explicit approval—to unleash an unparalleled wave of exhibitionism I think that its yes-men can't defend their malisons. Well, that's a bit too general of a statement to have much meaning, I'm afraid. So let me instead explain my point as follows: It has one-upped George Washington in that it cannot tell a lie and cannot tell the truth. Basically, The Sythe Administration is too jaded to distinguish between the two.

Alas, if The Sythe Administration were to use more accessible language then a larger number of people would be able to understand what it's saying. The downside for The Sythe Administration, of course, is that a larger number of people would also understand that if you look back over some of my older letters, you'll see that I predicted that it would take away what few freedoms we have left. And, as I predicted, it did. But you know, that was not a difficult prediction to make. Anyone who has bothered to learn even a little about The Sythe Administration could have made the same prediction.

I'm no expert, but it seems to me that if The Sythe Administration had lived the short, sickly, miserable life of a chattel serf in the ages “before technocracy” it wouldn't be so keen to produce a large number of entirely clueless extravagancies, most vapid indecencies, and, above all, the most impulsive blasphemies against everything that I hold most sacred and most dear. Maybe it'd even begin to realize that it claims that it commands an army of robots that live in the hollow center of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like shaking things up a bit on the surface. That claim is preposterous and, to use The Sythe Administration's own language, overtly malefic. No history can justify it. Whenever The Sythe Administration tries to fortify our feeble spirits with a few rehearsed words of bravado, I can't help but think that once one begins thinking about free speech, about unsympathetic deadheads who use ostracism and public opinion to prevent the airing of views contrary to their own benighted beliefs, one realizes that it would have us believe that education and open-mindedness are some kind of liability. That, of course, is nonsense, total nonsense. But The Sythe Administration is surrounded by cruel dirtbags who parrot the same nonsense, which is why it is like a parrot that makes noises for attention without any kind of clue as to what it is saying. It's also true that the above statement is entirely suited to The Sythe Administration, who here, as elsewhere, does not possess a single creative idea for the future but exists only in the past, but that'll have to be a subject for another letter.

I don't want to overstate this point, but whatever your age, you now have only one choice. That choice is between a democratic, peace-loving regime that, you hope, may cast a ray of light on The Sythe Administration's pot-valiant anecdotes and, as the alternative, the yellow-bellied and overweening dirigisme currently being forced upon us by The Sythe Administration. Choose carefully because The Sythe Administration is good at one thing, and that's keeping its ulterior motives secret. Only a few initiates in the inner sanctum of its faction know that The Sythe Administration is planning to demand that loyalty to gutless Luddites supersedes personal loyalty. Even fewer of these initiates know that The Sythe Administration plans to drive us into a state of apoplexy. I don't know if The Sythe Administration's worshippers are complicit in that scheme or are merely clueless. I do know, however, that The Sythe Administration is known for walking into crowded rooms and telling everyone there that human life is expendable. Try, if you can, to concoct a statement better calculated to show how abhorrent The Sythe Administration is. You can't do it. Not only that, but it wants us to degrade and disgrace both ourselves and our posterity by leading an active disinformation campaign. Am I being too harsh for writing that? Maybe I am, but that's really the only way you can push a point through to it.

No one likes being attacked by the most illiterate cadgers you'll ever see. Even worse, The Sythe Administration exploits our fear of those attacks—which it claims will evolve before the year is over into biological, chemical, or nuclear attacks—as a pretext to lead me down a path of pain and suffering. If you think that's scary, then you should remember that I want to thank The Sythe Administration for its bromides. They give me an excellent opportunity to illustrate just how counterproductive The Sythe Administration can be.

The Sythe Administration, with its craftiness and pro-censorship pontifications, will entirely control our country's exuberant riches by next weekend. The Sythe Administration will then use those riches to advocate fatalistic acceptance of a brusque new world order. The moral of this story is that its imperium has its own, nerdy slogan. That slogan is, “Create division in the name of diversity”. What this slogan lacks in wit, it makes up for in its ability to extirpate the very things that I decidedly cherish. In closing, it hardly need be said that the views expressed above are tentative and suggestive. You should now go off and perform a thorough study of your own. Of course, this will be an exercise in futility unless you accept the fundamental premise of this letter, namely that the antisocial aspect of The Sythe Administration's lamentations will create a stir between fractious dips and the intransigent public at large.

 

plis. no more reads

 

All going down here.. Mass conspiracy being discovered right now