High Pardon, Unban. "Sythe, please decide."

[Tenguage12]

OK. Regaurdless of the evidence R33lar3al, Tgump and I released proving Cloudsword and I have announced each other, let's just forget those threads even exist, and say I am guilty.

I am saying I AM GUILTY. 6months ago I was banned for Self Vouching, I would like to be pardoned of my crime and to be unbanned, now I understand the situation that has been going on with Sythe with the individuals that was DDoSing, and all of that bunch of stuff, which Richard and I was communicating back and forth while it was going on.

Richard, you know personally that I was not involved, other than helping you. So, Nate was banned BEFORE the new rule of the 3month ban limit for Self Vouching, and was given a second chance and his ban reduced to 1month because of the rule.

So, I respectably appreciate my ban to be reduced, now it has been 6months, so technically it would be nice to be unbanned, but for understanding, I will accept to wait a entire 3 more months due to the rule, unless you decide to lower it to 1-2months.

I have contributed to this community A LOT, I was a donater and an Ex-Mod. I helped hundreds of people in the community with personal problems, gaming problems, service problems, and a lot of other things. I took care of a lot of peoples needs, and had always offered my assistance in anything that had ever needed to be done with any member on Sythe, whether it have been a serious issue which involved members, a scam or what-not. I was there to help all the time.

As even you Richard knows of some of my assistance from even before I was a mod, when you and I would communicate through PM's here on Sythe about various of things, as well as my assistance to the entire community as to why I was promoted to be a mod.

So, I would very much appreciate a 'High Pardon' for my wrong doing from receiving a vouch from my cousin and allowing to him to use me on more than one occasion to MiddleMan for him.

Thank you.
-John Ashlock

 

[OldFinn]

This isn't a ''second parlour'' where you come and suddenly plead guilty when your dispute has been unsuccessful. I find it plainly insulting that you've juxtaposed ''I AM GUILTY'' and ''Richard, you know personally that I was not involved.'' The disputing process is not to be made a mockery of.

Sin666 is no moron and she banned you. As opportunistic as ever, you always try to appeal your ban when she isn't here to reaffirm it. It has already been denied. In fact, not only are you opportunistic but you are also very sly and two-faced. You spend a great deal of your time locking people's MSNs (mine included) and boasting jubilantly about it. It's becoming a trend for you to croon your ugly head, befriend staff members, and then dispute. It works on some, but I see straight through you and do not under any circumstances support the removal of this ban (a ban that was strongly maintained by Sin throughout the many disputes he's already had).

 

I told you time and time again not to confess to something you've actively protested that you didn't do... yet you go ahead and do it. Mega facepalm.