Head User Educator

[insanosky]

Please elaborate on why neither of us should be UE's. Please, I'd like to hear it.

r33l, he doesnt know what user education means...

 

[SuF]

Please elaborate on why neither of us should be UE's. Please, I'd like to hear it.

I would like to guess!

Its because you are not Unknown, and Unknown was better than you. You do not meet Unknowns standards, therefore you should not be a UE because Unknown who started the UEs would be mad that people that do not meet his standards are in the UE.

(Not like I think that, just what I think he thinks)

As for you two being HUE, neither of you is Unknown, but you two are the best two people for the job, and normally you vote for the lesser of two evils. Like me supporting Obama, instead of McCain. I feel Obama is not the best choice, but he is better than McCain so I must support him because there is no one else to support.

 

[verdammt ubel]

Please elaborate on why neither of us should be UE's. Please, I'd like to hear it.

EDIT:

On a side note, neither Rawr nor I asked for this thread. It was made voluntarily by an individual who wanted Rawr to be HUE. Supporters eventually came for us both and now we are here. We have only accepted support, nothing more.

We had a big thread about this in Feedback.

Can you explain what you mean? I do not understand what you are getting at.

There can't be one Head User Educator, because no one Educator knows about all the subjects (And in this case, the Educators don't know about any).

As for the kids saying I don't understand User Education, you'd be well-advised to actually read my posts and learn a bit of Sythe history.

 

[SuF]

There can't be one Head User Educator, because no one Educator knows about all the subjects (And in this case, the Educators don't know about any).

As for the kids saying I don't understand User Education, you'd be well-advised to actually read my posts and learn a bit of Sythe history.

You obviously do not understand the function of the HUE if you think they need to know about many subjects to be one. They are there to be able to recognize good guides, provide feedback on not so good ones, make decisions about the UE section, make decisions about who gets to be in the UE, and ect. They are in the UE not only to teach, but to learn as well.

 

[R33l2r3al]

We had a big thread about this in Feedback.


There can't be one Head User Educator, because no one Educator knows about all the subjects (And in this case, the Educators don't know about any).

As for the kids saying I don't understand User Education, you'd be well-advised to actually read my posts and learn a bit of Sythe history.

If you honestly think an HUE is required to know everything about all subjects, then are you quite wrong. HUE's are meant to manage the UE section, and as SuF said, provide legitimate feedback with User Submitted Guides and the Help and Requests section.

What makes you so omniscient in regards to UE matters? You joined this month.

 

[†Tysonâ€Â]

I also agree with this.

 

[__Abel__]

Ya i read a couple of rawr's threads and such he seems like he'd make a great HUE!

 

[verdammt ubel]

If you honestly think an HUE is required to know everything about all subjects, then are you quite wrong. HUE's are meant to manage the UE section, and as SuF said, provide legitimate feedback with User Submitted Guides and the Help and Requests section.

What makes you so omniscient in regards to UE matters? You joined this month.

Fine, you don't want the best UE to be HUE? You want a team leader?

What leadership qualities do you have? I want specific examples. Unless you've been in the Army or similar, the chances are that you have no real leadership skills. So we go back to my first point, the UE should lead by superiority, since he has no leadership skills otherwise. And, as per our argument in Feedback, you are shit.

 

[R33l2r3al]

Fine, you don't want the best UE to be HUE? You want a team leader?

What leadership qualities do you have? I want specific examples. Unless you've been in the Army or similar, the chances are that you have no real leadership skills. So we go back to my first point, the UE should lead by superiority, since he has no leadership skills otherwise. And, as per our argument in Feedback, you are shit.

Ok, for one, I do have leadership abilities, you want to hear about them?

• I am a 3rd year Drum Major for a 150 person marching band. Lead Drum Major might I add you.
• I have been an officer in NUMEROUS extracarricular activities, such a Make-A-Wish, NHS, and Key Club.
• I, with 3 other people, raised $8,000 in 5 days for Make-A-Wish, and it was completely spontaneous with NO pre-planning.

The list goes on, but I don't want to make a fool of you. And you dare to question my abilities? For all we know you're a 12 year old little kid who thinks he's better than everyone else because he can post on a forum.

Also, when did I say that I didn't want what is best for the UE? Obviously you can't read because you didn't see my previous post. For your sake though, I'll quote it for you.

As I've made clear to you already, my activity level has increased, not because of the position being available, but because I am on break from school. That became effective on Thursday and I have been on VERY often since then. It had nothing to do with the title.

Also, Rawr and I are not "fighting" for a title. If anything we are working together. As already stated by Finn, the HUE title is being revamped and I doubt that it will hold any considerable water in the staff. I am not in this for the rank, I'm in this for the UE. If you can't see that, then I'm sorry. If I was in this for the rank, I wouldn't be here to support Rawr, and him vice versa with me. We both have great ideas and I highly doubt that any of them would even be heard without such a title, as they have been suggested before, and ignored (by TD of course).

I'm not trying to disqualify your opinion, as it is still important (to me at least). I'm sorry that you feel this is all about a title. I would give up my User Rank right now if it would better the UE, and I'm not joking. I've put many hours into the UE and I don't base it on the opportunity to get a better rank. I doubt that Rawr would do that either. We both want what is best for the UE, and right now, that IS a new HUE, and an HUE that is going to be active.

That is my 100% honest opinion.

 

[Aeroplane]

I'd have to disagree. Just pointing out, isn't Rawr bi as well? I think R2R should be the next HUE. He's been here longer and seems to know the rules well enough.

R2R for HUE

 

[Rawr]

He's been here longer

Join date shouldn't matter, and him and I have been in the UE the same about of time almost as well.

 

[R33l2r3al]

I'd have to disagree. Just pointing out, isn't Rawr bi as well? I think R2R should be the next HUE. He's been here longer and seems to know the rules well enough.

R2R for HUE

Thanks for the support. Rawr is just as aware of the rules as I am though But thanks for the support!! ^_^

Join date shouldn't matter, and him and I have been in the UE the same about of time almost as well.

Oh come on, you know Join date means EVERYTHING /jokes ^_^

 

Would much rather see R33l2r3al as HUE instead of Rawr Im Phat, I see him helping out a lot more in the UE sections, but we'll see what happens.

 

[bennytheberry]

R33L2R3Al FOR HUE​