Head User Educator

As I've made clear to you already, my activity level has increased, not because of the position being available, but because I am on break from school. That became effective on Thursday and I have been on VERY often since then. It had nothing to do with the title.

Also, Rawr and I are not "fighting" for a title. If anything we are working together. As already stated by Finn, the HUE title is being revamped and I doubt that it will hold any considerable water in the staff. I am not in this for the rank, I'm in this for the UE. If you can't see that, then I'm sorry. If I was in this for the rank, I wouldn't be here to support Rawr, and him vice versa with me. We both have great ideas and I highly doubt that any of them would even be heard without such a title, as they have been suggested before, and ignored (by TD of course).

I'm not trying to disqualify your opinion, as it is still important (to me at least). I'm sorry that you feel this is all about a title. I would give up my User Rank right now if it would better the UE, and I'm not joking. I've put many hours into the UE and I don't base it on the opportunity to get a better rank. I doubt that Rawr would do that either. We both want what is best for the UE, and right now, that IS a new HUE, and an HUE that is going to be active.

That is my 100% honest opinion.

 

Well said, I agree comepletely. We're not fighting for the rank at all, we've been working countless amount of times together, to brainstorm ideas that could improve the UE. All R33l and I want is to bring the UE back like the old days.

 

I hope by that you do not mean the way it was when I was in it for like a week. That was horrid... Way too much fighting ect....

Who ever they pick, I assume you will have no staff powers, just the basic moderator powers you need to run the UE.... :/

And I just recently picked up my activity in the UE, like the same day Dark was demoded. That means nothing, nor does their activity increase.

 

I agree that the HUE should only have the essentials needed to run UE (lock, close, and move threads). The power to infract is not a necessary function which the HUE should have. Yeah, you have been decently active and I do enjoy reading up on some of your guides. Perhaps we should return the voting system? Which I heard was pretty affective?

 

The applying and voting on to get into the UE? I hated that because too many morons got in. Then the UE became EDRAMA and I said fuck it. I never got to leave since I was demoded for IDK why.


But UE's voting on guides before they get put into the UE section is an idea I like.

 

Yeah I like that idea as well. I mean, it would have to be different than it was, as previously described to me. But, if the right people were invited we could begin a voting process as soon as there was about 7 members of the team. We could re-introduce voting and i'm sure these 7 invitees would do a fine job of who is voted in based on the application system.

 

I uh, don't support?

I think that, truly, the dark should be put back in Head User Educator, and should just have staff privileges removed... LIKE I FUCKING SAID WHEN IT FIRST HAPPENED.

Rawr, you know I don't mind you, but seriously, everyone knows this is fucking stupid.

 

I think Dark was doing a fine job, but I would have to think that they will not give him HUE back...

 

He shouldn't have lost his position as head user ed as he shouldn't have been given the opportunity to access the Staff Lounge, or cause such issues with staff positions.

 

Yep Yep, I agree with you there. It was never supposed to be a staff position anyways... :/

 

I myself don't exactly know what powers the HUE has, but we should only be able to control the UE and no other section of the Sythe forums. I think the HUE should be part of staff though, so we can ask permission to have new parts added to the UE, because I doubt administrators would give that privalege out.

R33l and I, thought of a way that would solve the applications. If R33l or I were HUE, we'd try to bring back the applications, but with a much strickter policy. It would somewhat be like the MM applications, where you have people vouch with you along the way, but UE's take vote in there. Then the HUE would thuroughly look through and see if the member is worthy, and not just for the rank. We would not have a 'poll' system like the previous applications either, it would all be help in the application itself, persay.

 

Yes, as far as the voting system was concerned, Rawr and I have put a lot of time into brainstorming the legistics of a new, hopefully more effective system. We would like to give it a shot, as it could potentially bring the team and the section back to life.

 

Didn't we agree that User Education on this site was embarrassing and shit?

 

Well, right now its disorganized and I think it needs a few hours and a good mod sorting through it and stuff. Kinda but not really... Some guides r great others suck.


@You other 2 people that both want HUE. D:


I would support a application process for UE, only if its much harder to get in. I mean, not just about writing guides, about the persons overall nicest and helpfulness in the forum. As for guides, I think they should have to have a few things to be good.

A: Correct Grammar and Spelling.
B: Organized Well
C: Correct Information
D: Full Sentences
E: Pictures if it could use them

The old guides that people were writing to get in were mainly total shit, that were semi good, but for a section that is supposed to seem smart, they were utter shit.

It does seem like you both want to help, and I think you guys as a team, no matter which gets HUE, (Even if neither of you do) you will do loads of good stuff. You have thought up the ideas, and now we just need to get them going.

 

UE needs to be so much more exclusive. The fact that we are considering these two candidates as replacements for Unknown (Who founded it) is ridiculous. They shouldn't even be UEs, let alone candidates for HUE.

 

Yes, I agree that Unknown was better than them both, but can you find someone better for the position? There is no one else in the community that feels like doing it, or that are able to.

 

There can't really be a "Head User Educator", practically. There should be a Tech User Ed, a Real Life User Ed and a Schooling (Or similar relating to academia) User Ed.

NULLWARE FOR TECH USER ED

 

There can't really be a "Head User Educator", practically. There should be a Head Tech User Ed, a Head Real Life User Ed and a Head Schooling (Or similar relating to academia) User Ed.

NULLWARE FOR TECH USER ED

 

Can you explain what you mean? I do not understand what you are getting at.

 

Please elaborate on why neither of us should be UE's. Please, I'd like to hear it.

EDIT:

On a side note, neither Rawr nor I asked for this thread. It was made voluntarily by an individual who wanted Rawr to be HUE. Supporters eventually came for us both and now we are here. We have only accepted support, nothing more.