Hayley williams sig.

[Kiabin]

I've made a Hayley Williams sig before, and it didn't turn out what I expected. I liked the turnout of this, because I actually took my time on it and remembered the times I valued photoshop in my best work.

EDIT: THIS IS GOING TO BE THE FIRST POLL OF MY CONTESTS. You must state on which one you voted for, and why.

CC is appreciated.

VS.

As said, CC is always welcome.

 

[The Riddler_]

Seriously, who the fuck is Hayley Williams and why is like everyone obsessed with her?



The only thing I got to say is you probably should have made the height more, and the width smaller, and done something with the left side.

 

[Kiabin]

Seriously, who the fuck is Hayley Williams and why is like everyone obsessed with her?



The only thing I got to say is you probably should have made the height more, and the width smaller, and done something with the left side.

Stay on topic, please.


I'm not going to do that. For one, I don't want to blend in with the rest of the "youtube sig legends" who actually SUCK, and have no talent at all. I make my sigs usually 400x90 so they can stay different than all of the other "gfx" nubs.

Second, the left side in fact IS the focal. Maybe you mean the right side ? I added a normal space stock and erased over it to give it a good feeling.

 

[Kiabin]

I prefer signature one because of the visually dynamic lines running across parts of the signature, and the colors of signature two hurt my eyes more. I'm also not sure where your random cross came from in signature two.

What do you do to the color of your signatures? You almost always seem to add some vile orange overtone that hurts my eyes. You do really well with shapes and textures, but you need to tone down whatever you're doing to alter the color.

Just a question.. Do you have eye problems? If you don't, it's most likely what it looks like on your monitor. I add a yellow photo filter, and then set it to darken, apply the image. On the comp I make my sigs with, it looks sharpened and fine. And then when I get on my laptop, It looks blurry, so I have to sharpen it to get the better results.

 

[Kiabin]

Actually, yes, but I don't think that contributes much to this. I guess I'm just saying that I infinitely prefer the colors in your current signature (the blue-gray combination) to the yellow-orange you seem fond of. You make signatures well, but I would try to use softer colors now and then. ^_^

Yeah, definitely. I use my warming filters WAY more than the cooling ones. I'm going to take your CC for granted, and work on that a bit more. And yes, I did use both of the same filters on both sigs.

 

[The Riddler_]

Just a question.. Do you have eye problems? If you don't, it's most likely what it looks like on your monitor. I add a yellow photo filter, and then set it to darken, apply the image. On the comp I make my sigs with, it looks sharpened and fine. And then when I get on my laptop, It looks blurry, so I have to sharpen it to get the better results.

- Just asked a question
- Maybe the size of the one in your sig.
- Yes, i meant the right


I like the 2nd one.

 

[Kiabin]

- Just asked a question
- Maybe the size of the one in your sig.
- Yes, i meant the right


I like the 2nd one.

Well, thank you . To answer your question.. Have you ever heard of the band Paramore? She's the lead singer.

 

[T R 1 B A L]

Signature One - much clearer depth, clearer focal point, much better lighting. Sexier in general

 

[Kiabin]

Signature One - much clearer depth, clearer focal point, much better lighting. Sexier in general

Haha, thanks. The second one, I sort of used the same technique in my newer one, "Chris Griffin." It's a fun technique to do.

 

[Lilsoufside]

The first one blends better, like the lighting on it, and like tribal said, it has a more clearer focal point.

 

[Bbrian]

For one, I don't want to blend in with the rest of the "youtube sig legends" who actually SUCK, and have no talent at all. I make my sigs usually 400x90 so they can stay different than all of the other "gfx" nubs.

I loled