Halo Reach VS Black Ops

[Daycare]

Reach, I like being able to have a "come back" kill.

 

[Daycare]

Blackops > Everything was updated and loads of new things added where as halo reach was just another halo with a different graphical face.

Yeah you're right, the new armor effects and new weapons don't change the multi-player game play at all.

 

[ElijahBossin]

Blackops ofcourse lol, I hate everything about Halo, especially its ranking system

 

[killzer1234]

I pick Halo Reach because not only does it have good gameplay but a good history overall. Halo (To me) has never disappointed since Halo CE campaign wise and mostly multiplayer wise.

 

[Mythbusters]

Halo in the long run, although I enjoy Black Ops, Halo just takes more skill, you actually have a chance to kill someone if they get a shot from behind on you. While in COD its camp and shoot anyone walking infront of you. In Halo if people are camping, you at least have a chance to kill them if you don't see them (most of the time)

 

[my2cents]

Reach please. They've got a team who listen to their loyal players, and i just find the overall gameplay a lot more enjoyable

 

[florol]

I got Black Ops, I beat the campaign and I was like "what could go wrong." After playing the multiplayer I just returned it and on Christmas I got Halo Reach. The campaign is amazing, the multiplayer is amazing, everything about it is amazing. So I vote Halo Reach.

 

[Boring]

Reach is alot more fun, and stuff, black ops is just so pointless...

 

[XolX]

I would have to say I like both the same for different reasons. I love the gameplay for Black Ops and the zombies. But for Halo reach I love the forge and the forge maps etc. But I voted Black ops on this one.

Same here man.
Same here.
I voted Black Ops for those reasons.

(btw I have both)

 

[hey guys]

Definitely Reach, Blackops to me is just an downgrade from MW2. reach was an actual upgrade and is fun.

 

[Oh Bama]

Black Ops all the way, never been a halo fan.

 

[ßioHazard]

Black ops. Halo Reach disappointed me to much, Halo 3 was wayyyy beter

 

[Tyrbus]

I vote Reach, although it was pretty close. Where Black Ops didn't really evolve CoD along much at all (I wasn't really expecting it to do so), Reach added in Armor Abilities (Worst of all: Armor Lock), both of which are major turn offs for me. Setting those complaints aside, Reach is the title that obviously had a clearer vision of what it wanted to be, and what it actually became. The direction on the game was more precise than that of Black Ops.

Both are fun games, but honestly, I really just want me some Skyrim right about now...

 

[Frutis]

black ops, never played halo

 

[runescapevision]

Definitely Black Ops, The whole Halo franchise is pretty much garbage online and is setup for the spray and pray types that take tons of shots to kill 1 person and lets you live forever. I will give it to halo on making a fairly good campaign the battles are usually pretty fun etc. but other than that they are pretty lame

I own black ops halo 1,2,3 and my good friend owns reach which I've played

 

[rsnewwild]

has to be black ops the maps got to love em and the kill streaks

 

[Canada Man]

I'll prefer the Halo series to COD anyday, despite Halo Reach being a disappointment.

 

[RmcStudios]

COD for sure, not really a "play everyday game" but its funny to play once in a while

 

[my2cents]

Halo reach. I played halo 2 and 3, I just feel more comfortable with it. I don't own black ops only mw2 so I haven't tried put the new shit yet

 

[mmaman88]

reach im more of a guy who likes to play xbl and the multiplayer on halo games are alot better. Its a game thats harder to pick up and takes alot of skill. I h8 COD