h2o

[Ghouben]

Newest.

 

[T R 1 B A L]

Oversharpened, flare is distracting, effects are quite nice, but no depth/real composition makes my eyes jitter like bitches.

 

[Ghouben]

Thanks for the CC, just not the makes my eyes jitter like bitches xD

Unfortunately the stock was low quality, but I still wanted to use it.. so the outcome is a bit weird like you say

 

[w000t]

I've seen this stock. Not much at all has been done to it at all mate :\

 

[Ghouben]

I think i've done enough.
Simplicity can be nice too, I think a lot of effects would ruin this.

 

[w000t]

All I see done is a gradient/curves and a light source.

I agree on the simplicity can be nice, But if you're going to post something for CnC It should have more effects,etc.

 

[Spraynwipe]

Light source is too strong. I agree with the others, I think you could have done more with this, and still kept it simple.

 

[Meloman]

Theres not much to it, but what you did change from the stock made it worse :S

 

[deathlyy]

I agree, the light source is too strong. Makes the bubbles to bright

 

[Saito]

Over sharpened, light is to bright, and I don't like the glare.

 

[Pshynosis]

All I see done is a gradient/curves and a light source.

I agree on the simplicity can be nice, But if you're going to post something for CnC It should have more effects,etc.

I don't agree. Creating something on photoshop isn't all about how much layers and effects you get down.

For OP the tag looks nice, but I can't really make out what's in it. Well I saw the original stock so I get the picture now but maybe you should try to make it more cleat. Oversharpened like said before ^

 

[Saito]

I don't agree. Creating something on photoshop isn't all about how much layers and effects you get down.

For OP the tag looks nice, but I can't really make out what's in it. Well I saw the original stock so I get the picture now but maybe you should try to make it more cleat. Oversharpened like said before ^

Agreed I've seen beautiful 4 layer signatures, making a signature doesn't have to be complex and if you think that then you should look a little more into graphics ;P. Anyways, this signature has its flaws and I listed above what I think they are, which is about all you've done with this stock.

 

[w000t]

Agreed I've seen beautiful 4 layer signatures, making a signature doesn't have to be complex and if you think that then you should look a little more into graphics ;P. Anyways, this signature has its flaws and I listed above what I think they are, which is about all you've done with this stock.

This is true, but like I stated above there is no need to post something with minimal work done for critique as there is nothing to critique on.

 

[Saito]

Agreed, but if you post up your work on GFX ShowCase people will Critique it anyways. I honestly think it is a good sig from what you have done. I just think you overdid the little effects you have. If the lighting was a bit lower and not sharpened as much, I think this signature would look nice even if simple.

 

[Ghouben]

Thanks for the comment Saito, I know I would get CnC like this though.. but it's always good!

 

[ADM_Trader]

Pretty nice