Guide Verifiers

[Spam Reporter]

I have suggest this idea numerous times. Without any talk about it.

I would definatley think I'd be a good Guide 'Verifier' when it comes to krunch time.

However , Although this is the Mods job - They do it for good will , not because they have to...

100% Suppport

 

[Gurtaton]

Heh. I wouldn't ever be one of these guide verifiers because my account sucks. It would be good to get paid guides for free though. >_> If you ever were to leak and have a OMM/UE rank, those ranks should be removed along with a one month ban. So yeah, support, even though I never bought a guide and never will. They're all horsecrap. I agree with SuF's idea about listing these verifiers in a thread. Plznate4officialguideverifier.

 

[Spam Reporter]

There also should be a 100% no leak policy , Obviously...

 

[FaTaL Sh0t X]

There also should be a 100% no leak policy , Obviously...

Oh yeah, that's a big deal, too. Completely forgot about that.

 

[Skillers FTW]

Just put market mods on the case, and actually ASSIGN some to this cause, that want to. None of this OMM and UE faggotry.

 

[FaTaL Sh0t X]

Just put market mods on the case, and actually ASSIGN some to this cause, that want to. None of this OMM and UE faggotry.

Refer to:

Okay.. so you want us to go ingame and spend our GP and time to verify your guide is legit? Oh, don't forget another hour+ insuring you've not ripped it so that you can go on to profit? Sorry, but this requires more effort than an OMM and yet they make something. You want quick response to your guides, drop a few dollars on not only making sure your guide is legit, but also to protect it from being sold by another member. Guides take a lot of time to verify. Guess what, we sort of have a life too..

He has many valid points.

 

[jCash]

Basiclly no one will want to do it unless there is a rank involved.

 

[Pureown]

Basiclly no one will want to do it unless there is a rank involved.

i am willing to do it without a rank
like it was said before, an official list will be made

 

[M I K E]

Basiclly no one will want to do it unless there is a rank involved.

Way to come out and speak the truth

 

I agree with this but:

Must be a respected member of the community.
Must be on Sythe for at least 6 months.
Must be nominated by one of the current staff.
Accumulated X amount of vouches as a result.
In General be a "Trusted" Member

Support

 

[Feren Silver]

I agree with this but:

Must be a respected member of the community.
Must be on Sythe for at least 6 months.
Must be nominated by one of the current staff.
Accumulated X amount of vouches as a result.
In General be a "Trusted" Member

Support

You can't throw vouches into the equation. I can vouch someone for a cool name or for giving me $150,000. It would come purely down to a staff decision in my opinion.

 

Basically, if this idea gets approved, people who are able to do them must be recommended by a mod.

 

[RunescapeRwtFTW]

This is a pretty good suggestion..There should be an application thread.
I would definitely apply for being a verifier.
I support

 

[HamJam]

You can't throw vouches into the equation. I can vouch someone for a cool name or for giving me $150,000. It would come purely down to a staff decision in my opinion.

Not if there vouches are from previous guide selling.... Like I said earlier:

For the application process I'd suggest the requirements to be something like this:
- To have sold previous guides on the guide sections.
- Accumulated X amount of vouches as a result of selling these guides.
- In General be a "Trusted" Member and of course have the mods backing

 

[cosrob97]

well before you make somebody a verifier you have to have a pretty decent account other wise what's the point of being one. Like some guides require high lvls and you got a low lvl.

 

well also before you make somebody a verifier you have to have a pretty decent account other wise what's the point of being one. Like some guides require high lvls and you got a low lvl.

That has nothing to do with being a guide verifier.

 

[cosrob97]

That has nothing to do with being a guide verifier.

Yes, but most guides require a account. Am i right? What if you have some shitty lvl 30 account which can't do shit because its never done a quest.

All im saying is there no point of being a verifier if you have a shit account which would be pointless to verify

 

Yes, but most guides require a account. Am i right? What if you have some shitty lvl 30 account which can't do shit because its never done a quest.

All im saying is there no point of being a verifier if you have a shit account which would be pointless to verify

Then don't apply to be a verifier, lol.

Some guides require you to have combat, some require quests, some require nothing at all. The account you have doesn't matter if you're applying to verify a guide. The point is that if a user PMs you to verify their guide, you react and don't deny them and actually TRY to verify their guide.

 

[Spyike]

well before you make somebody a verifier you have to have a pretty decent account other wise what's the point of being one. Like some guides require high lvls and you got a low lvl.

I do agree that capabilities/constraints concerning a member's skill-sets and accounts should be addressed/questioned prior to being selected. A selected reviewer with low-level accounts and/or no ingame funds may start leaking to seek assistance to review

 

I do agree that capabilities/constraints concerning a member's skill-sets and accounts should be addressed/questioned prior to being selected. A selected reviewer with low-level accounts and/or no ingame funds may start leaking to seek assistance to review

Not all guides involve RWT or GP sells..