Google SEO section

[MohtasaUnique]

Lately, Sythe has been endorsing the posting of spam threads with the intent of boosting our site to the top of trending google search results. It's ruining the spam forum with a flood of threads, so I suggest a subforum under the spam forum, or somewhere else out of the way for these sort of threads so it doesn't flood the spam forum.






SYTHE IS ENDORSING THIS FLOODING FOR SEO PURPOSES, THEREFORE THE SOLUTION IS NOT "JUST INFRACT THEM" SINCE IT'S BEING ALLOWED

 

[Grave]

No, terrible idea. Just infract people for flooding.

 

[MohtasaUnique]

Sythe is endorsing it

 

[Fendle]

No support, pointless.

 

[MohtasaUnique]

No support, pointless.

So you're cool with this?

 

[Nerfed]

Ummmm what why, no sub forum pointless. Just use infractions for flooding isent that against the rules of the spam anywhoos.

Naom and flying toast should be infracted.

There obviously doing it on purpose.

 

[MohtasaUnique]

Ummmm what why, no sub forum pointless. Just use infractions for flooding isent that against the rules of the spam anywhoos.

Read the OP, sythe is endorsing the flooding = it's allowed, not infractable, not against the rules

 

[SuF]

You stole my idea. >_>

 

[MohtasaUnique]

I totes had the idea first!

[02:37:55] <&MohtasaUnique> Sythe should make a subsection in the spam forum for this sort of stuff
[02:38:19] <+JJKK> yeah let's get more sections!!!
[02:38:45] <&SuF> news forum
[02:38:47] <&SuF> news bot
[02:38:54] <&SuF> auto grabs trending shit

Your idea was having a bot do it instead of users doing it c:

 

[Piramid]

Why the fuck are people doing this? It's ruining the spam forum

 

[SuF]

I totes had the idea first!

Your idea was having a bot do it instead of users doing it c:

I thought of it before you. I just didn't want to make it publicly known without more thought.

 

[MohtasaUnique]

I thought of it before you. I just didn't want to make it publicly known without more thought.

I can see why, obviously if you don't spell this shit out, people don't read the OP and simply slap their dicks against the keyboard and call it good:

No, terrible idea. Just infract people for flooding.

No support, pointless.

Ummmm what why, no sub forum pointless. Just use infractions for flooding isent that against the rules of the spam anywhoos.

Naom and flying toast should be infracted.

There obviously doing it on purpose.

 

[JohnK]

who really gives a fuck its called spam forum a purpose people can do whatever the fuck they want in there, even if that means making a bunch of threads about a 14 year old fucking her dad. at least that's how i see it.

i thought we just been through all the regulation bullshit

 

[MohtasaUnique]

Regulations which concerned flaming, not flooding

 

[Grave]

SYTHE IS ENDORSING THIS FLOODING FOR SEO PURPOSES, THEREFORE THE SOLUTION IS NOT "JUST INFRACT THEM" SINCE IT'S BEING ALLOWED

Only got one question. You fucking pooper-peeved? U anally anguished?? u gonna cry??? Just infract them anyway. My boy Richie will be fine with it. I'm on the phone with him right now. The point was to attract people with relevant threads, not completely flood the spam forum for multiple pointless pieces of shit.

 

I agree 100%.

We are flooding the Spam Forum and honestly I can't go find any threads to troll on since they are all trying to pull views in, which is a great idea.

 

[JohnK]

Regulations which concerned flaming, not flooding

i don't see why spamming threads in the spam forum is ruining the spam forum, the place where you can spam all you like.

 

[Grave]

i don't see why spamming threads in the spam forum is ruining the spam forum, the place where you can spam all you like.

The spam forum has evolved to something better than just spam threads. I would think you of all people, with your join date, would understand. This is a terrific suggestion.

 

[MohtasaUnique]

i don't see why spamming threads in the spam forum is ruining the spam forum, the place where you can spam all you like.

There's no intrigue to 3 pages of spamming articles and SEO tag words, it's flooding out the usual discussion

 

[Grave]

There's no intrigue to 3 pages of spamming articles and SEO tag words, it's flooding out the usual discussion

Use off-topic then?