God does not exist.

1. Everyone knows what these words mean, you're the first person who has questioned them.

2. I did read it, it was utter nonsense. You basically restated what I said, and then told me it was wrong, and gave me a link to a website that didn't work (most likely on purpose, because you have no direction in your opinion and you thought it would make me assume "oh, maybe the link was supposed to direct me somewhere that would complete his point, i'll give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he's correct."

 

My mistake on the link, for some reason it had a paranthesis at the end.

Try:
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/begging-the-question.html

It basically means that in your proof of God you assume that God exists, which is fallacious.

 

Your logic is flawed. As I said, God exists only where and when he is needed. In all other cases, God is on stand-by. I proved this in my first post, no need to say it again.

 

Your post continuously contradicts itself. I can see part of your point being that god is merely a part of our imagination, but then you attribute an individual personality to your point, and its all a cluster fuck.

If your point was that god is part of our imagination, and he only exists within our thoughts when we think of god, then yes, I agree. Elsewise, I don't get what you're saying.

I do not have god on stand-by in my mind. I will NEVER, not even if it was absolutely crucial to my existence, NEED or WANT a god in my life. You proved nothing, you merely stated an opinion, which... I can't really understand... The bad use of grammar, the run on sentences, and the Dr. Seuss words made it even more difficult.

 

There was absolutely no "proof," as you claim, in that entire paragraph. All you did was state your opinion. If you do publish it, prepare to be torn to shreds.

 

The book is half-way written. There's no turning back now. Still buy it, even if you don't like my writing style (as you have posted many times but agree with my actual idea) because it's more poetic in my book than in my posts, and you might understand it better through poems. If you doubt my skill with words in poetry, you can just wait, because I'll be posting a song/poem in the near future. I'll post it in the Music/Poetry section and I'll link you here.

 

Learn to separate creative writing, and debate/intelligent conversations. Abstract thinking, though somewhat valid, shouldn't be passed as solid facts, or heavily defended.

 

god is so ftw

 

Well then maybe you'll appreciate my poetry, I'll try to put that song up very soon, I'm just waiting to get it back from a professional audio engineer to get it sounding how I want it. Probably before Christmas.

 

I suggest you don't dodge his question and simply tell him what those words mean, rather than attempt to belittle him which in turn makes you seem unintelligent. Slang is not generally used in professional texts, and if it is, it is usually defined in an appendix at the end. Define these words.

 

Needed? Like when athletes win gold medals and they thank god?
What about when women are raped and when innocent civilians are beheaded? What about when thousands of children die of aids? What about the thousands of people who die of cancer? What about when a troubled kid walks into a school and kills pupils and children? Where's your god then?

 

That seriously made me laugh, the first person ever in the world to use that word? lol.

On topic, i don't think he exists because it's just such a ridiculous story.

 

Without us, there is no god, and no Earth.
God and Lucifer only exist within our minds, believing in one or both of 'them' will fulfill your prophecy on them existing. It's not a true fact, but that's how I think.
They are only real if you believe in it.

 

Lawl, I actually don't have anything to say about this thread, except I find it funny how Sythe never actually answers the question I would like to see answered.

Most his arguments are "irrelevant" answers, and everyone (including Sythe) keeps repeating themselves.

He doesn't even provide any valid "proof" in my eyes, yet people are sucking up, go you!

If we shall be this close minded I should create a thread called "God exist" and just get everyone to prove that he doesn't, even though no one will actually come with a justified answer.

 

What are you talking about? What questions aren't answered?

 

Several was just ignored, however, I'm not planning on going trough 12 pages again.

The one I mostly wanted to see the answer to though (Sythes answer), was the one Backstab555 asked ;

(I'm just trying to see it from his point of view, and it would make it easier if he could answer simple questions as that).

 

Those were answered validly.

1. Why does the universe have to be created by something? Why do you need to attribute a creator to a creation? Couldn't it just have happened naturally? I don't think you can grasp infinite. And no one knows how the universe 'started'. But making guesses in the dark doesn't make them valid. We don't claim to know exactly how it happened, we're just saying you don't either. Also, time is a concept to humans. It doesn't actually exist.

2. The burden of proof is not on us to prove that God doesn't exist, it's on the people who believe in God that are required to prove that God DOES exist. It'd be like me saying "I can move things with my mind". Your response would be "Prove it". My response could then be (according to you) "Prove that I can't".

The questions aren't ignored, they were answered. You probably just didn't understand the answers.

 

Simply quote me to the answers then

First of, I'm not actually saying I believe or disbelieve in God, I just wanted to know the answer to that question.

So as this thread stated "God does not exist" it's for the thread creator to prove that he doesn't exist then?

Because that's not exactly how it's working in this thread at the moment. Yes, certain people are actually using pretty good arguments, whilst others are just using questions to avoid answering.

I never claimed I knew, but I do however think there has to be a start of "something".

 

If you read the first post then you would see what he meant by it.

Then who created god? Then who created the being that created god? Then who created the being that created the being that created god? etc...