Feedback to whoever this concerns

[kfjjjdst]

So, some staff member, thought one and went around removing [trusted] from some of my thread titles. I understand I have a twc, but if I managed to get 3 MM's done today, and another sucessful trade, I do not see how am I that untrusted. I also have over 20+ vouches, and I do not think it's the mod's job to decide what I find myself. USFine's thread (from a 3 post account), yesturday posted the very same kind of thread with the same label. Theirs wasn't removed. I think mine shouldn't be removed either.

Another thing: If whoever did this was kind enough to be such a coolguy, the minimum would be to contact me about it, not just go around and judge by yourself.
Dissapointing,
if whoever did it, you have a response to this, I'm awaiting it.
Thanks.

 

[Sindrefyrn]

I did it.

It's exactly the TWC which made me do it. I don't think anyone flagged suspicious by staff should go around and call themselves trusted.

Also, handle many such things a day, I can't PM everyone.

 

[kfjjjdst]

I did it.

It's exactly the TWC which made me do it. I don't think anyone flagged suspicious by staff should go around and call themselves trusted.

Also, handle many such things a day, I can't PM everyone.

flagged by staff untrusted? me being honest enough to admit to something which I did wrong back in the days, without any proof against me, ever pressured, and flagged untrusted by staff? Ah.

 

[Sindrefyrn]

flagged by staff untrusted? me being honest enough to admit to something which I did wrong back in the days, without any proof against me, ever pressured, and flagged untrusted by staff? Ah.

Exactly. I don't want to argue about this. If any other staff member though it did the wrong thing, feel free to add [Trusted] to his title again.

 

[kfjjjdst]

Exactly. I don't want to argue about this. If any other staff member though it did the wrong thing, feel free to add [Trusted] to his title again.

So by this you declare that if I wanted to add <beefcake> to my threads, I wasn't allowed, because I ain't a beefcake? Please also don't forget to respond about my USFINE's concerns either.
EDIT: Please do keep in mind: I may not be trusted in your eyes, but I MM'ed 3 trades today, and made another successful trade. Definetly suspicious.

 

[Sindrefyrn]

So by this you declare that if I wanted to add <beefcake> to my threads, I wasn't allowed, because I ain't a beefcake? Please also don't forget to respond about my USFINE's concerns either.

I don't know about the case. Can you link me Usfine's thread?

 

[kfjjjdst]

I don't know about the case. Can you link me Usfine's thread?

http://www.sythe.org/showthread.php?t=877708
But still no response. I'm not a beefcake. May I add <Beefcake> as a thread label?
EDIT:
I see you had no guts on deleting it on a 10 posters leecher's thread. Congratulations to ya. How is he more trusted then me?

 

[Sindrefyrn]

http://www.sythe.org/showthread.php?t=877708
But still no response. I'm not a beefcake. May I add <Beefcake> as a thread label?
EDIT:
I see you had no guts on deleting it on a 10 posters leecher's thread. Congratulations to ya. How is he more trusted then me?

Why would you have <Beefcake> in your thread title?

Usfine is a known and trustable company, you are not.

 

[kfjjjdst]

Why would you have <Beefcake> in your thread title?

Usfine is a known and trustable company, you are not.

except when there was proof against them scamming. And there always is. and why wouldnt I have beefcake as a label? Please do not answer with a question. Answer: YES or NO. May I or not?

 

A thread title is like your own property: You can put whatever you want. When I had TWC, I always put trusted in my titles.

 

[kfjjjdst]

A thread title is like your own property: You can put whatever you want. When I had TWC, I always put trusted in my titles.

finally someone who understands my point. thanks.

 

[Sindrefyrn]

Sindre:
*I am allowed to remove "trusted" from users titles if they aren't trusted, right?
Finn:
*Well
*Define trusted
*What makes someone trusted
Sindre:
*They're not trusted if they have a TWC anyway?
Finn:
*Yeah that's not trusted

^^^^^

 

[kfjjjdst]

^^^^^

Please answer MY question: May I have beefcake in thread labels? dont avoid my question.
ALSO: users titles? thats something totally different then users' threads' titles.

 

[Karl]

kfjjdst,
what you're doing is deception, you've been punished before, yet your trying to make them see past that and look at your "trusted".

And to be fair. just because you MM'd some trades and that doesnt change anything

I could get 100's of vouches, then Scam. Or vice versa, does that make me still a trustworthy person?

No. just because someone choose to trade legitimately for once or few times, doesnt make them legit.

 

[kfjjjdst]

kfjjdst,
what you're doing is deception, you've been punished before, yet your trying to make them see past that and look at your "trusted".

And to be fair. just because you MM'd some trades and that doesnt change anything

I could get 100's of vouches, then Scam. Or vice versa, does that make me still a trustworthy person?

No. just because someone choose to trade legitimately for once or few times, doesnt make them legit.

get out of here. you arent concerned. reported.
ontopic: I traded legit 25 times, and you dont even know why I have the twc, so get out of this thread. now.

 

[Freddy Mercury]

get out of here. you arent concerned. reported.
ontopic: I traded legit 25 times, and you dont even know why I have the twc, so get out of this thread. now.

Was hahanerd45 concerned? Was hahanerd45 reported?
There are two kinds of safeguarding your own thread:
1. Reporting anyone not concerned.
2. Reporting only the ones that disagree with you.

The latter being immensely hypocritical and self-serving,
you should have an "answer with caution" title in my opinion,
I assume you're going to report this post but how should I've known?
Proving the necessity of you getting AWC title

 

[kfjjjdst]

Was hahanerd45 concerned? Was hahanerd45 reported?
There are two kinds of safeguarding your own thread:
1. Reporting anyone not concerned.
2. Reporting only the ones that disagree with you.

The latter being immensely hypocritical and self-serving,
you should have an "answer with caution" title in my opinion,
I assume you're going to report this post but how should I've known?
Proving the necessity of you getting AWC title

No. To answer your question: his post wasnt constructive. I had 25 vouches before getting the twc, I couldve scammed way before over $100, and he doesn't even know the story anyways. Thank you for your point of view, though.

 

[Lakers]

I honestly think it's fucked up for the moderator to do that. Secondly, you can fucking put whatever you want in your thread title, eg:

Selling BEAST ZERKER PURE

It could have the shittiest stats, but it gets people's attention.

 

[kfjjjdst]

I honestly think it's fucked up for the moderator to do that. Secondly, you can fucking put whatever you want in your thread title, eg:

Selling BEAST ZERKER PURE

It could have the shittiest stats, but it gets people's attention.

Thanks. What made me wonder infact was, that Sindre always tried to avoid my question about having <beefcake> labels in my thread even though I ain't a beefcake.

 

[iWaW]

You can't really call yourself 'Trusted' if you aren't really actually trusted. It's mis-leading.

Also, you can't report someone for posting their honest views.