So you believe that nothing should be done because there are too many ways in which children can be bullied? Surely tackling at least part of the problem is better than sitting back & doing nothing because it is near impossible to put a stop to bullying within the school grounds.
It's not a problem though. You would strip a child of his individuality and ability to express himself and turn him into a sheep?
I think you're making a rather large assumption here, 'No one is going to bully a charismatic and funny kid, it just doesn't happen' when you make such statements, sources are needed to back up your argument.
Otherwise, I hereby make the claim that bullying is solely caused by children wearing shabby clothes.
First off, my 'assumption' was not an assumption, granted it was a hyperbole but it's nonetheless true. One of the main reasons people bully someone is because their a weak/easy target. A strong or charismatic kid is not a weak target hence highly unlikely to be bullied. You've also made a claim that has no support whatsoever hence self-refuting yourself. Two explanations: Frustration-Aggression Hypothesis, and Dysfunctional Family.
http://www.livescience.com/8155-bullies-pick-unpopular-kids-study-finds.html
I hardly regard wearing uniform as punishing children, in England, almost every school has a uniform code & It is widely accepted, it is evident that you've got a different experience.
I've worn a uniform my whole life. How is it not punishing children. You can't wear this, you can only wear this. That is exactly what they are saying. Imagine if you wanted to play baseball and your parents say no you must play ping pong. Imagine if you wanted to go out with your friends and your parents said no, you must study. Imagine if you wanted to wear some comfortable clothes to the beach and your parents said no, you must wear a suit and tie. Imagine if a school is saying you must wear a uniform and not your own casual clothes. Just because something is widely accepted, doesn't mean it's not punishment.
If you put your logic into prospective, many jobs require a certain dress code/uniform varying from a suit to illuminative clothes, would it be unfair for an employer to ask the employee to abide by this dress code/uniform?
Dress code is entirely different from a uniform. Also, no one is forcing you to stay at that job. Schools differ slightly, most kids are entrenched in that school, and never made the choice to go, and never had the ability to retaliate until their later years. As for uniforms, I don't think there are many jobs at all that enforce a homogeneous uniform code.
I don't pretend that society is equal, however when it comes to schooling at a young age, in the classroom, they should be given equal opportunities, and not be subject to harassment because of the way they dress.
You have no evidence that they will be subject to bullying or harassment because of the way they dress. Even if they do be subject to harassment, not only is it not bullying, but it is HIGHLY likely that a plethora of other reasons cumulatively provoked the bully to bully. Equal opportunity has been tried in the American education system, No child left behind Act. It failed, miserably. They ended up holding the smart back and allowing the 'dumb' to catch up, and in the end everyone suffered.
It is highly accepted by psychologists and has evidence to support that bullies will tend to bully weaker kids. Now this is actually not pin-point accurate, but, it is good enough for laymen's terms. Just think about it, if your a bully, would you bully someone who's big and tank, and has a gang of friends, or would you bully that nerd with his head down at the bus stop?