- Joined
- Jun 3, 2014
- Sythe Gold
- 4,836
- Messages
- 51,976
This report is on behalf of myself, I am not posting this for Mike as I am an involved party.
Scammer's profile link:
Mimi
Explanation of the trade:
Mike was developing a website for Mimi for $2,000 USD - Mike went 8 months over timeframe and Mimi does not want to pay the remaining $1000 once it's done and wants to keep the work Mike's did.
How they scammed:
Did not pay the $1000 to Mike to finish the website which is 95% done - Reported Mike for scamming him when he's the one trying to keep the work, Mike is willing to refund the $1000 so Mimi can go elsewhere if he chooses and hire a new developer, Mimi is still trying to keep the site and is using a statement from Mike after he harassed him for days on end in his broken English telling him he could keep the site than he blocked him. Mike meant it as;
"
Today at 7:43 PM
that was yesterday, and he kept saying he was going to use it so I said go ahead I'm not refunding you then
thats not giving ownership, thats saying if he's going to use it he's not getting a refund
"
Statement made:
Screenshot - c057a0ceb30d3901dc424e78d0131aac - Gyazo
Mimi is essentially refusing to now take a refund, He is refusing to give Mike the work back that he's done for a refund, He is trying to keep all of Mike's work based on a statement that was not meant to change ownership, and he is trying to scam Mike the website and or out of his owed $1000 once the last few site changes/additions are done. The website is within 2 days of full completition Mike has said(95% done).
Mike should not be banned, if anything Mimi should be the one banned.
Proof that it's their Skype:
N/a
Skype profile ID & conversation pictures:
N/a
Other relevant trade screenshots:
I dare say the developers on staff would understand that projects run behind, Mike had a fellow developer quit on him and he got stuck with all of the projects which buried him in work. Mimi does not get to keep Mike's work because Mike said a 1 sentence statement after constant harassment and Mimi hired a new developer for an hour. Mike clearly meant it as a statement to inform him about what happens if he uses it, not a ownership change.
Mike is fully accepting of issuing Mimi a full $1000 refund and taking his work back, Mimi is now trying to gouge Mike even when a full refund is offered showing he never really wanted a refund, he just wants to screw Mike and get cheap quality work because he went over timeframe. Mike understands he was in the wrong running 8 months behind but if Mimi intends to use his work he owes him for it. That or Mimi takes a refund and mike gets the site back.
Scammer's profile link:
Mimi
Explanation of the trade:
Mike was developing a website for Mimi for $2,000 USD - Mike went 8 months over timeframe and Mimi does not want to pay the remaining $1000 once it's done and wants to keep the work Mike's did.
How they scammed:
Did not pay the $1000 to Mike to finish the website which is 95% done - Reported Mike for scamming him when he's the one trying to keep the work, Mike is willing to refund the $1000 so Mimi can go elsewhere if he chooses and hire a new developer, Mimi is still trying to keep the site and is using a statement from Mike after he harassed him for days on end in his broken English telling him he could keep the site than he blocked him. Mike meant it as;
"
Today at 7:43 PM
that was yesterday, and he kept saying he was going to use it so I said go ahead I'm not refunding you then
thats not giving ownership, thats saying if he's going to use it he's not getting a refund
"
Statement made:
Screenshot - c057a0ceb30d3901dc424e78d0131aac - Gyazo
Mimi is essentially refusing to now take a refund, He is refusing to give Mike the work back that he's done for a refund, He is trying to keep all of Mike's work based on a statement that was not meant to change ownership, and he is trying to scam Mike the website and or out of his owed $1000 once the last few site changes/additions are done. The website is within 2 days of full completition Mike has said(95% done).
Mike should not be banned, if anything Mimi should be the one banned.
Proof that it's their Skype:
N/a
Skype profile ID & conversation pictures:
N/a
Other relevant trade screenshots:
I dare say the developers on staff would understand that projects run behind, Mike had a fellow developer quit on him and he got stuck with all of the projects which buried him in work. Mimi does not get to keep Mike's work because Mike said a 1 sentence statement after constant harassment and Mimi hired a new developer for an hour. Mike clearly meant it as a statement to inform him about what happens if he uses it, not a ownership change.
Mike is fully accepting of issuing Mimi a full $1000 refund and taking his work back, Mimi is now trying to gouge Mike even when a full refund is offered showing he never really wanted a refund, he just wants to screw Mike and get cheap quality work because he went over timeframe. Mike understands he was in the wrong running 8 months behind but if Mimi intends to use his work he owes him for it. That or Mimi takes a refund and mike gets the site back.
Last edited:

















