[DRAMA] Dave BANNED

he did more correct investigating in 5 min then you did as whole time you were on staff

Also again I'd like to point out that you never gave me any proper feedback when I was on staff other than having poor judgement. You never once linked me to any scam reports I didn't do correctly nor did any other staff member. So it's nice of you to point out my faults AFTER I left staff instead of telling me to begin with.

 

[SuF]

Also again I'd like to point out that you never gave me any proper feedback when I was on staff other than having poor judgement. You never once linked me to any scam reports I didn't do correctly nor did any other staff member. So it's nice of you to point out my faults AFTER I left staff instead of telling me to begin with.

staff really has always needed more mentoring. maybe with the new peer review system that could be something people do

 

staff really has always needed more mentoring. maybe with the new peer review system that could be something people do

I honestly just want @FireZ to admit he never gave me any actual evidence I was fucking up (If he does I will happily drop it) but the other 3 times I've brought this up he's never given me a proper response.

 

[SuF]

I honestly just want @FireZ to admit he never gave me any actual evidence I was fucking up (If he does I will happily drop it) but the other 3 times I've brought this up he's never given me a proper response.

meh take it on the chin and try to fix it next time. did you reapply for staff?

 

[FireZ]

I honestly just want @FireZ to admit he never gave me any actual evidence I was fucking up (If he does I will happily drop it) but the other 3 times I've brought this up he's never given me a proper response.

they were all over the place...if done again would have handled differently tho

 

meh take it on the chin and try to fix it next time. did you reapply for staff?

What can I say, I wasn't very good but I tried.

they were all over the place...if done again would have handled differently tho

And I would have happily tried to fix it. It's all good, I'm not mad but don't think it's fair when you did that. No hard feelings.

 

[SuF]

hurrah everyone is still happy tree friends

 

hurrah everyone is still happy tree friends

To answer your question, I don't think so. I don't know what @Sythe qualifies as active seeing as most his staff treat Sythe as their #1 priority which isn't a bad thing, but I have other things and wouldn't be able to dedicate as much time as I could be.

 

[SuF]

To answer your question, I don't think so. I don't know what @Sythe qualifies as active seeing as most his staff treat Sythe as their #1 priority which isn't a bad thing, but I have other things and wouldn't be able to dedicate as much time as I could be.

yeah can't really agree with him there. activity is less important than being competent since you can always just promote more people to get the same amount done.

 

yeah can't really agree with him there. activity is less important than being competent since you can always just promote more people to get the same amount done.

I'm just going off of whatever he said in that one thread, cba to look it up. Isn't that what he was promoting? Activity? Correct me if I'm wrong.

 

Dave was a good guy.

was

was

was

 

[SuF]

I'm just going off of whatever he said in that one thread, cba to look it up. Isn't that what he was promoting? Activity? Correct me if I'm wrong.

eh partly. i think the rotator is about activity above competence but the peer reviews are about both i think

 

[SuF]

Dave was a good guy.

was

was

was

RIP Dave

 

eh partly. i think the rotator is about activity above competence but the peer reviews are about both i think

Wtf is a peer review? Where is this at?

 

[SuF]

Wtf is a peer review? Where is this at?

staff lounge. staff members write reviews of one another to determine if they are active and should stay staff. its the new thing

 

[Unfortunate]

I don't think I mentioned that I'm a girl yet.

 

staff lounge. staff members write reviews of one another to determine if they are active and should stay staff. its the new thing

That's not new. We did that as well.

 

[SuF]

That's not new. We did that as well.

i mean its like more official now instead of just mod score

 

i mean its like more official now instead of just mod score

I don't think the peer reviews were solely based off modscores though.. not that I remember anyways. Maybe I'm wrong. Did you reapply for staff yet?

 

[SuF]

I don't think the peer reviews were solely based off modscores though.. not that I remember anyways. Maybe I'm wrong. Did you reapply for staff yet?

i did and it's in voting lol

idk exactly what they are doing now but it seems like a nice step in the right direction