staking is a better alternative, 50/50 chance of winning
Surely not 50/50? I know how well you hit, etc, does come down to luck, but skill and experience can easily give you an edge in staking. Some players have staked for years, before and after the RWT updates and they've made much more than they've lost, because they're good at it.
On top of this, with staking, you never know when you are about to get glitched on. All of a sudden your "50%" chance of winning is down to 0.
Dragon dyce gives you a 50% chance of winning on duels, not 40% as someone said. After the duel they take the 10% cut.
Which it makes it 45% total over all.
just go stake twice and make profit
Surely not 50/50? I know how well you hit, etc, does come down to luck, but skill and experience can easily give you an edge in staking. Some players have staked for years, before and after the RWT updates and they've made much more than they've lost, because they're good at it.
On top of this, with staking, you never know when you are about to get glitched on. All of a sudden your "50%" chance of winning is down to 0.
Dragon dyce gives you a 50% chance of winning on duels, not 40% as someone said. After the duel they take the 10% cut.
Where do you get 45% from? I'm talking about the better's chance of winning. Its 50% unless playing a game like hot/cold or over/under. The commission the host takes in the end is irrelevant to the player's chance at winning.