Do not allow lure discussion/etc

... what? But when you're doing both of those things, you KNOW there is a chance you can lose them. Luring someone gives them no chance to KNOW they MAY lose their items.

...

... you didn't bother to read the replies did you?

 

You aren't making valid or coherent points anymore lol. You stated that people unknowingly go into the wilderness, against their will, which is why I started a "thing" about warning messages to explain that people indeed know when they are going into the wilderness. Any Runescape player that has accumulated an amount of wealth that can attract a lurer is aware of the dangers of the wilderness, and they knowingly/willingly take that risk out of their own greed. It can easily be prevented. And if someone simply ignores a warning message isn't it their own fault since they choose to take that risk?

 

Both of those, you know the risk of losing it.

...

Read the rest of the thread.

They know they are in the wild. They know they are pking.



*sorry if this is posted twice, said it was already posted, but didn't show up*

 

Rushing though is sorta like luring?
I have no idea when the next dbower is going to attack me, and maybe I just want that range pot on the ground and I end up losing void or w/e I have on me ...

 

Your point was about a warning message when entering the wilderness, or about to enter it.

I came back with a point about the trade warning messages.
Saying that the trade cannot be reversed.. what is the difference?

Tricking someone into clicking accept, even though they see the warning message. Saying you're going to give them something once they accept it.
Then tricking someone into going into the wild, even though they see the warning, or know of the warning.

Reason they went in wild: to get something in return from you.
Reason they accepted the trade: to get something in return from you
Both have warning systems/messages in place.

 

You're in the wild already.
And you're prepared to fight.

 

Look, the mods dont have time to do everything they do, and then babysit the community to prevent them from talking of luring.

 

I'm not always potted as I usually pk on a pure...
or sometimes I just want to go to kill some green drags on forinthry(if its spelled right) dungeon and on my way there I get attacked?

 

Babysit the community to prevent them from talking of luring?
Are you stupid?

They have to "babysit" this community for every other rule there is.

No auth trading, we know that. Yet people still post.
No recovering accounts, we know. Yet people still post.
The list can go on

 

What about luring 2010 prods from single to multi? That's also considered luring?

 

You go there, you know it's in the wild.
You know the route to get to your destination is in/passes the wild.

 

Exactly so they shouldnt have to divert more attention to luring discussions, because honestly they cant do anything about it besides delete threads, and by diverting their attention with simple luring posts they wont be able to do as good as a job staying on top of things such as recovering accounts

 

I brought up the point that there are warning systems in place to explain to you that your point didn't make any sense. Players do know when they are entering the wild, it would not make any sense to say that they unknowingly enter it which is what you stated.

There's a major difference that you apparently aren't aware of between scamming someone in a trade and luring. When you lure someone you convince them to enter the wilderness, their own greed being used against them. In the wilderness you are allowed to kill people for their stuff, that's what it is meant for. It is a part of the game that can not be entered unless the individual makes the conscious decision to enter it. If a player willingly and knowingly enters the wilderness while knowing the dangers of the wilderness then why should I feel any sympathy for them? It is a gamble that they are willing to take.

 

It will just show up as another "spam" report them the mods see it.
Report it as spam, and put "Not allowed"
And you'll get a reply "Done, thanks"

 

I still don't think you understand my point.
When isn't greed used for ones own gain?

 

I still don't think you understand my point. The individual that gets lured is aware that the wilderness is a dangerous place where it is legal and allowed to kill someone for their own gain. Knowing this, they still enter the wilderness out of their own free will along with their valuable items/cash. My point is that they choose to ignore the dangers of a part of the game implemented by Jagex themselves, the wilderness, where it is perfectly acceptable to kill someone for their own benefit. They choose to ignore the dangers of this part of the game.. and that stems from their own greed.

I hope you now understand how luring and scamming are nowhere near the same thing and why Jagex themselves have chosen to not make luring bannable.

 

Exactly what i was saying.

 

I agree completely. I view luring as stealing, just like you do. We even have a sticky to find a luring partner. The sticky should definitely be removed, as well as all the guides for luring.

 

I completely agree with you, but I feel this isn't as one sided as you guys think it is.

 

What about luring guards to kill people botting for their range guild tickets ? Is this considered luring .. When does it end

I think you gathered from my previous post that I don't support the banning of luring on Sythe.