Hello all, and most importantly, djweasel:
I'm here to argue my infraction and lobby on removal of it, as well as questioning your moderation in the thread: http://www.sythe.org/real-life-misc...ing-600-per-day-all-revealed-fourkingpro.html
Story, for anyone who cares:
I reported the person for a TwC request below:
http://www.sythe.org/report-scammer/1525434-requesting-twc-jordlea1.html
I then went ahead and argued with the seller, for about an hour, with 20 posts made on the thread, stating reasons why the claims on the original post cannot be true; Let's jump a bit: On the last post, the seller jordlea1 admitted that he added fake details about the guide, to boost the sales - Djweasel went ahead and deleted this post, and I was infracted for spamming.
So I ask; If I argue someone for 1 hour with 10 posts made and get him to admit that he lied in original post, I was spamming, and his admission gets deleted? I'm also questioning the post you made, which reads:
How was I guide guessing at all? Have you read the posts? I'm starting to get an impression you tl;dr'd half of the posts and simply infracted me. I was proving the point (which turned out to be true) that the seller is advertising a guide, that he is not selling in reality.
OP Reads:
On his last post (which you deleted, though I have no idea why), he stated this guide was about abusing the deposit bonuses on poker sites; Now, do these two things (his original post details and the guide details) have anything at all in common, except for the fact both are related to poker?
- I don't think so.
Now I understand why the seller denied telling me his username (he never made any profits off poker, because he just abuses the bonus system, and basically scams).
So, moderation of these events is the following: the post where OP admits he lied is deleted, I'm infracted and told to shut up with my spam and guide guessing. The posts if you interpret it that way, may have been spam, but at the end of the day, my argument got him to admit he lied; and I'm infracted for uncovering a seller who is a guide with details on original post which are packed of fake lies? I see.
Nothing personal, I just don't understand why you'd delete that thread where he admitted, and defend him, who lied on his original post, and infract me for uncovering this.
That is all,
Regards,
kfjjjdst
PS: I just realized he edited the thread to say he ALSO has a guide about that, after he admitted his lies. This is getting ridiclious.
Today, 01:01 AM (my post)
Last edited by jordlea1 : Today at 01:07 AM. - No comment.
I'm here to argue my infraction and lobby on removal of it, as well as questioning your moderation in the thread: http://www.sythe.org/real-life-misc...ing-600-per-day-all-revealed-fourkingpro.html
Story, for anyone who cares:
I reported the person for a TwC request below:
http://www.sythe.org/report-scammer/1525434-requesting-twc-jordlea1.html
I then went ahead and argued with the seller, for about an hour, with 20 posts made on the thread, stating reasons why the claims on the original post cannot be true; Let's jump a bit: On the last post, the seller jordlea1 admitted that he added fake details about the guide, to boost the sales - Djweasel went ahead and deleted this post, and I was infracted for spamming.
So I ask; If I argue someone for 1 hour with 10 posts made and get him to admit that he lied in original post, I was spamming, and his admission gets deleted? I'm also questioning the post you made, which reads:
How was I guide guessing at all? Have you read the posts? I'm starting to get an impression you tl;dr'd half of the posts and simply infracted me. I was proving the point (which turned out to be true) that the seller is advertising a guide, that he is not selling in reality.
OP Reads:
^Please view this post's history, as this has been edited since he admitted to lying. The (I have an E-book regards this as well) wasn't there until I posted this thread.
On his last post (which you deleted, though I have no idea why), he stated this guide was about abusing the deposit bonuses on poker sites; Now, do these two things (his original post details and the guide details) have anything at all in common, except for the fact both are related to poker?
- I don't think so.
Now I understand why the seller denied telling me his username (he never made any profits off poker, because he just abuses the bonus system, and basically scams).
So, moderation of these events is the following: the post where OP admits he lied is deleted, I'm infracted and told to shut up with my spam and guide guessing. The posts if you interpret it that way, may have been spam, but at the end of the day, my argument got him to admit he lied; and I'm infracted for uncovering a seller who is a guide with details on original post which are packed of fake lies? I see.
Nothing personal, I just don't understand why you'd delete that thread where he admitted, and defend him, who lied on his original post, and infract me for uncovering this.
That is all,
Regards,
kfjjjdst
PS: I just realized he edited the thread to say he ALSO has a guide about that, after he admitted his lies. This is getting ridiclious.
Today, 01:01 AM (my post)
Last edited by jordlea1 : Today at 01:07 AM. - No comment.
