Disputing useless TwC

[pointman]

In response to Wolf's post in my earlier thread....

I don't use MM's. But I found out that you guys have OMM's. So thats what I can use (I'll use Rsprod for any future trades).

Requesting TwC to be removed, due to no evidence of scamming.

 

[Clashfan]

Should really be removed, using an MM is in no way mandatory.

 

http://piclion.com/images/proofaga.png

You refused to go first or use an MM. Why didn't you tell that user you wanted to use an OMM?

 

[pointman]

http://piclion.com/images/proofaga.png

You refused to go first or use an MM. Why didn't you tell that user you wanted to use an OMM?

Cause I did not know about OMM's at the time .

 

You also had a scam report with insufficient evidence...

If you want us to consider removing your TwC, post proof of successful trades.

 

[pointman]

You also had a scam report with insufficient evidence...

If you want us to consider removing your TwC, post proof of successful trades.

Meaning none at all.

Why should I get stuck with a TwC?, I didn't break any rules, never scammed, never bad mouthed anyone (yet).

Imo, fake TwC is fake TwC.

 

Meaning none at all.

The reason I brought that up is because it might have been true, but we couldn't do anything without evidence.

Why should I get stuck with a TwC?, I didn't break any rules, never scammed, never bad mouthed anyone (yet).

Imo, fake TwC is fake TwC.

It's for suspicious activity. Not going first and not using an MM. For all we know, you can be lying about the whole "I never knew about OMM's before," thing. Also, we can't really state you never scammed, we can say you never got a report with sufficient evidence for scamming. I don't care, if you wan't the TwC removed, post proof of successful trades, you're no exception.

 

[FireZ]

Denied, come back when you've done some good trades