Dialatic's Ban? [Banned by: Karl]

[Dialaticdispute]

I was just banned again because "Karl reviewed your old ban dispute and it's worthy of a ban".

After that ban dispute was settled, Peppered (the guy who filed it) even admitted that it might not have been me who did it. He was very mature and said that someone else may have had access as well.

Again, I had received permission to make this new account, and I will not post anywhere else but this very thread.

The reason my IP is different is because I'm on vacation in Canada, staying at my grandparents at the moment.

Original report: http://sythe.org/showthread.php?t=1191222

Giddy also said I wasn't guilty.. Why am I being banned for it?

Edit: I have been banned 3 times in the past for this incident too. I did not scam this guy.

Karl doesn't know the case.

[11:27] <+Wolfdog_> Punker, I read through the report. Its a bit iffy. Everything there could have been faked or set up.
[11:27] <+Dialatic> Wolfdog: about me?
[11:27] <+Dialatic> Wolfdog_ ^^
[11:27] <+Wolfdog_> Dialatic - I always record my going onto an acc for the first time after someone been using it, I think that should be required for acc's that someone else had control of
[11:27] <+Ryan> yes imagine
[11:27] <+Wolfdog_> Cause your report could have easily been faked
[11:28] <+Ryan> can i see this report?
[11:28] <+Dialatic> The report about me you mean?
[11:28] <+Wolfdog_> Yep
[11:28] <+Dialatic> http://sythe.org/showthread.php?t=1233773 Ryan
[11:28] <+Ryan> thanks
[11:28] <+Wolfdog_> If the kid had recorded the first time he went on, we'd have solid proof
[11:28] <+Wolfdog_> Otherwise he could have just xferr'd the gold onto a different account
[11:28] <+Dialatic> Not solid either.. Because he could have transferred. But yeah.
[11:28] <+Punker> i dont' think peppered would fake a report.
[11:28] <+Dialatic> Would be better than what he has now.
[11:28] <+Wolfdog_> Neither do i.
[11:29] <+Wolfdog_> Anyone wanna buy 100m gold?
[11:29] <+Dialatic> Peppered even told me that it could have been someone else.
[11:29] <+Dialatic> After I was unbanned
[11:29] <+Dialatic> so this is bull.
[11:29] <+Wolfdog_> Did he get shots of the IP?
[11:29] <+Dialatic> no
[11:29] <+Dialatic> Wait
[11:29] <+Dialatic> maybe
[11:29] <+Dialatic> I did admit that I was on it
[11:29] <+Dialatic> but the bank had nothing in it
[11:30] <+blindkilla> I lost
[11:30] <+Imagine>
[11:30] <+Imagine> I'll go post it on the official threda
[11:30] <+Wolfdog_> I've been in the sitaution where someone tells me they have 100m in a bank, and I logon and theirs nothing there - BUT I always record that way I have 100% proof

Clash saying that I was already banned for this...

[11:30] <&Clash> Dialatic
[11:30] <+Dialatic> Clash
[11:31] <&Clash> didn't i unban you at some point for that
[11:31] <+Halo> I have a 1gp bank
[11:31] <+Halo> nuff said
[11:31] <+Dialatic> Yes
[11:31] <+Dialatic> so did Giddy
[11:31] <+Imagine> wow, blade you're good
[11:31] <+Dialatic> then Karl rebanned me because "he reviewed it"

 

[Karl]

http://img31.imageshack.us/img31/2664/screenshot20110816at711.png

Why are you staking the exact amount that was stolen?

Also, I assume that Giddy's unban was due to the fact that he didnt drop your items, which is a ridiculous proposal for not enough evidence.

 

[Dialaticdispute]

What? I had over 700m at that point. I never stole that 350m...

You're saying that if someone collects Santa hats, then is accused of scamming one, and then he tries to sell one, he scammed it? Your logic makes no sense.

 

[Karl]

You got the 350m for free, hence why you dont mind risking it by boxing.

And to be honest, it makes perfect sense.

 

[Dialaticdispute]

You got the 350m for free, hence why you dont mind risking it by boxing.

And to be honest, it makes perfect sense.

It makes perfect sense that it was half of my current cash pile so it was what I was willing to risk.

If I scammed 350m, why would I make a thread about having an additional 350m, and going to box with it? I have a few threads of staking pictures with me winning over 300m, which makes sense as well.

 

You got the 350m for free, hence why you dont mind risking it by boxing.

And to be honest, it makes perfect sense.

It actually doesn't make much sense. This looks way too situational to ban for, and having read the old report, I agree with Clash & Giddy's judgment on this case.

 

[Dialaticdispute]

It actually doesn't make much sense. This looks way too situational to ban for, and having read the old report, I agree with Clash & Giddy's judgment on this case.

This really is very situational. The whole report was.

I fully admit that I logged on to the guys account, but it had nothing of value really. He had even admitted after that it may not have been me who did it (after the first dispute was settled and I was unbanned).

Karl should have private messaged me or something about it, or Peppered, and discussed it with us other than go out on a limb and ban me for it.

And like I previously stated, 700m was my cash pile that I made from staking/services. I was only dicing with half of it, which is where 350m came from. It never even clicked in that I was accused of scamming 350m, and that it would look suspicious. Why would I make a thread knowing that I scammed 350m, saying that I had 350m extra?

 

You've been unbanned as this has been sorted out.