Determining Truths

[T V]

You're flip flopping between two definitions of subjective and objective whilst trying to tie both together in an attempt to make sense of what you're saying.

These are the definitions that are relevant to this discussion:

Subjective - based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions.

Objective - (of a person or their judgment) not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts.

Idk man, maybe.

But I'm at the end of what I can say for the moment, so, if you're sincerely interested in the topic, I'll defer you to Foucault

The Archaeology of Knowledge - Wikipedia

A statement... [is linked] to a 'referential' that is made up not of 'thing', 'facts', 'realities', or 'beings', but of laws of possibility, rules of existence for the objects that are named, designated, or described within it, and for the relations that are affirmed or denied in it. The referential... defines the possibilities of appearance and delimitation of that which gives meaning to the sentence, a value as truth to the proposition. (p. 91: 1972)

 

[Bruno Rs]

I believe anything I read or see. Very dumb.