If I looked at the thread correctly, you can’t expect him to pay you back for the money you lost when the customer charged back. You should protect your employees rather than exploit them. Even if he didn't follow the correct checks, he attempted to and shouldn't be required to pay the full amount.
I probably didn't read anything correctly, but whatever.
The way the commissions worked at the time, workers were a lot more responsible for their actions. However, I have learned from the Mayberry case specifically that it doesn't work out very well, as when it comes to the worker assuming responsibility, they're not willing to go based on the agreement.
Now, we have a "chargeback protection" program for our independent contractors.




















































