Concerning Jensen...

[Robin]

Before I start something, I want to say that the staff have FULL authority to ban someone, for no reason or for some. I also agree that reselling a guide should not be allowed, now, onto my debate. When a police officer pulls you over, and starts asking questions, etc. You are allowed to refuse and ask to speak to your lawyer, people DO NOT have to fully comply with the officers of law, etc.

Also, if the officer asks a question that you could answer but prefer not to because it may be used against you, you may not have to answer. In many instances, you have the right to tell the officer that you would rather talk to a lawyer about the situation first, or that you would rather not discuss the matter at this time.

So, did Miklman, as an officer (MOD) have the right to randomly "test" one of his customers? Miklman says that he did this because he was afraid that Jensen would leak, but he had no reason or proof, so Jensen was tricked. Since were talking about "lawfulness", this is a breach of moderation conduct. I don't want to start a flame war, or neccecarily bring Jensen back, but I think this should be mentioned -.-.

 

[TiggerZ]

I'm completely lost, can you post a link where your referring to?

 

[durial20]

this isnt a traffic thing this is a website where traps are placed to sort out good peeps from bad.

 

[Robin]

I'm completely lost, can you post a link where your referring to?

http://www.tonyzirklelaw.com/CM/FSD...l-Law/Traffic-Violations.asp?focus=topic&id=4

this isnt a traffic thing this is a website where traps are placed to sort out good peeps from bad.

Yes, but everyone was talking about how this applies to real life (copyright infringment, etc.) Im just providing an example.

 

[Govind]

I don't know why you people think that you can discuss bans like this, you have absolutely no effect on the outcome. He was banned, he'll stay banned, end of story.