do you prefare call of duty 4's multiplayer or world at war's?
Personally, i prefare WaW's as it isn't as fast paced, and has realistic firepower, but with cod4, It can take you a full clip of a skorp or uzi, but yet 2 shots of the m4.
If I got to chose a game, it would be modern warfare 2, because I don't like to play old World War II game, i'd rather play stuff that's happening today.
CoD4.Everytime I play CoD:WaW Someone Always glitches No matter what,Yes I know CoD4 has some Glitches But hardly Anyone does them (Atleast When I play).I cant even play a HQ Game on WaW Without someone getting Under the map.Always taking the HQ,Or Glitching some way.
An Uzi bullet/sub-machine gun or any of those civilian guns have a bullet that goes through you, shatters bones, and what not.
Now an M4 bullet on the other hand breaks, kinda like an exploding bullet but contained and just like BB's but very very sharp and at a high velocity. So in this method, a bullet could hit you in the knee cap, the bullet shatters and bounces off your knee and travels up through your organs and comes out of your head. M4 bullet, and M16 bullets are extremely dangerous weapons and only to be traded, used, and contained by government officials. My StepDad(basically blood relative to me) was in the army for 26 years and knows everything there is to know.
Call of Duty 4 has a lot more of the experienced players, thus it's harder for me to maintain a 1.50 kill death ratio. World at War is a piece of cake whilst using Juggernaut/MP40/Last stand.
If I got to chose a game, it would be modern warfare 2, because I don't like to play old World War II game, i'd rather play stuff that's happening today.