Challenge the staff here - v2.0
- Thread starter Govind
- Start date
- Status
Nathan, i thought you of all people would have been able to work out he meant something more along the lines of "No active corruption that gets ignored/condoned" rather then simply no corruption at all.
you know i love an arguement lol
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2005
- Sythe Gold
- 23
- Messages
- 7,825
(Meant to post this last night)
Sigh. This thread was intended to be a place where people could share their opinions about staff and so-called “corruption†and be proven wrong. However, due to people being so arrogant that they assumed that they were in the right about their baseless accusations and finger-pointing, this thread is now closed. What can I say? You can’t give people the opportunity to criticize the management without people abusing it and trying to cause trouble for fun. And you all complain about how we don’t have regard for the opinions of users – and the staff say it's because the users are generally clueless. Now, I’ve always thought that was slightly off the mark. I don’t anymore. Guess which side I agree with, thanks to this thread?
GG.
Sigh. This thread was intended to be a place where people could share their opinions about staff and so-called “corruption†and be proven wrong. However, due to people being so arrogant that they assumed that they were in the right about their baseless accusations and finger-pointing, this thread is now closed. What can I say? You can’t give people the opportunity to criticize the management without people abusing it and trying to cause trouble for fun. And you all complain about how we don’t have regard for the opinions of users – and the staff say it's because the users are generally clueless. Now, I’ve always thought that was slightly off the mark. I don’t anymore. Guess which side I agree with, thanks to this thread?
GG.
- Status