care for the enemy?

All of your explanations have one and one only base - Being a pussy. Well look, DUDE, it may seem like being a "pussy" to whatever standards you live by, and it may be seen as 'over', but I'd rather be a pussy than have my life taken away?

And for the simple fact that again, YOU DON'T READ! My entire beginning argument was based off of the care for an enemy status, assuming that they were on the battlefield. The enemy. Like you said, a man with no threat to an opposing side is not an enemy. The definition stands. AN ENEMY.

I would not care for an enemy, and as I am answering the beginning question, my scenarios are not childish, but are comprised of everything that war is also comprised of. It's my enemy. The way you're thinking is obviously assuming that ofcourse, everyone has on their minds what you have on your mind.

Yet, ofcourse, I'm the pussy. (BTW - It's the debate forum. You won't find many people debating with a vague expression. Expect defensiveness.)

 

The real enemy is the people ordering them. These soldiers are no different to our own, they have families, possibly wife and kids. Why do you think they diserve to die for the orders they follow?

why?

I wasnt directly calling you a pussy, i was just stating that its a very cowardly act to kill an unarmed man.

 

Or perhaps, Catholic Nuns with guns.


Oh boy.