care for the enemy?

[Arya]

Theres a difference between in war and on the battlefield.




Lmao, your scenarios are childish. Yes, im sure it would be very easy with your hands tied behind your back. And usually they make you walk infront, and if you try anything you would be shot before you could scratch your arse. Also, if they where this type of person, they wouldnt surrender would they?



Logic tells me that a man without a gun waving a white flag is no threat. If you feel threatened, you would be to much of a pussy to be let into the defence force. Your logic says that all prisoners of war should be killed, Do you think thats right?



Its not about being nice or not, Its about avoiding senseless death. If you think its moral to kill a defenceless man, then good for you.

Look, chill out dude. I dont know why your getting so defencive.

Your way of thinking can be used outside of war. Say theres a criminal robbing a bank with a knife, the police come and they tell him to drop the knife, he drops it, Right now hes no different to a surrendered enemy. You think the police should shoot him dead simply because he might go jackie chan and snap someones neck? You think that he is much of a threat? Are you that much of a pussy to not be able to control an unarmed person?

All of your explanations have one and one only base - Being a pussy. Well look, DUDE, it may seem like being a "pussy" to whatever standards you live by, and it may be seen as 'over', but I'd rather be a pussy than have my life taken away?

And for the simple fact that again, YOU DON'T READ! My entire beginning argument was based off of the care for an enemy status, assuming that they were on the battlefield. The enemy. Like you said, a man with no threat to an opposing side is not an enemy. The definition stands. AN ENEMY.

I would not care for an enemy, and as I am answering the beginning question, my scenarios are not childish, but are comprised of everything that war is also comprised of. It's my enemy. The way you're thinking is obviously assuming that ofcourse, everyone has on their minds what you have on your mind.

Yet, ofcourse, I'm the pussy. (BTW - It's the debate forum. You won't find many people debating with a vague expression. Expect defensiveness.)

 

[porman]

The enemy. Like you said, a man with no threat to an opposing side is not an enemy. The definition stands. AN ENEMY.

The real enemy is the people ordering them. These soldiers are no different to our own, they have families, possibly wife and kids. Why do you think they diserve to die for the orders they follow?

I would not care for an enemy

why?

Yet, ofcourse, I'm the pussy. (BTW - It's the debate forum. You won't find many people debating with a vague expression. Expect defensiveness.)

I wasnt directly calling you a pussy, i was just stating that its a very cowardly act to kill an unarmed man.

 

[LegitNamesCo]

It's 72 virgins, not 42. What I find humorous about this part of the Quran, is that it doesn't state that the 72 virgins are females. Imagine a terrorist showing up in Heaven, finding 72 nerdy dudes. Just imagine the expression on his face.

Or perhaps, Catholic Nuns with guns.


Oh boy.